Derrel Sims : abduction 体験の諸相を語る

前置き

この動画は過去記事でも取り上げたが、今回は AI で整理した。

この動画は過去記事でも取り上げているが、今回 AI で整理することで、極めて重要な内容、つまり implantと scoop mark の謎を解く鍵を含んでいることに気付いた。

近く、別記事で

• abductee の体表にのこる傷や scoop mark
• abductee の体内で発見される implant

の正体とその発生機序の謎解きを行う。

概要

AI

エイリアンハンターの視点：接触と証拠

この対談は、‌‌エイリアンハンター‌‌として知られるダリル・シムズと、UFO現象に対する彼のユニークな視点に焦点を当てています。

シムズ氏は、4歳の時にエイリアンとの最初の出会いを経験して以来、生涯にわたるUFOの目撃とエイリアンとの遭遇について語ります。彼は、捕獲の試み、DNAサンプルの発見、そして「エイリアンの蛍光」と呼ばれる独特の印の認識など、‌‌エイリアンの物理的証拠の追求‌‌に自身の活動の中心を置いています。

また、軍事警察官および元CIA工作員としての彼の背景も議論され、政府のUFOに関する知識は限定的であるという彼の見解が示されます。シムズ氏は、エイリアンが知能指数が低く、人類と相互作用するために製造された「モデル」であるという彼の理論も紹介し、個人が誘拐を防ぐための方法についても助言を提供しています。

目次

1. 前置き
2. 概要
3. 音声対話
4. 詳細
   1. エイリアン蛍光（Alien Fluorescence）:
   2. インプラント:
   3. インプラントの機能（推測）:
   4. スクープマーク:
   5. 結論
5. 時系列
6. 主要関係者
   1. ダレル・シムズ (Darrel Sims):
   2. ロジャー・リア (Dr. Roger Leir):
   3. ロバート・ビゲロー (Robert Bigelow):
   4. スタン・フリードマン (Stanton Friedman):
   5. アレハンドロ (Alejandro):
   6. ホスト（マーティン）:
   7. マシュー (Matthew):
   8. クリス (Chris):
   9. フィリップ (Phil):
   10. ドナ (Donna):
   11. デイビッド・ジェイコブス (David Jacobs):
   12. ジョン・マック (Dr. John Mack):
   13. ニック・ビラキス (Dr. Nick Bilakis):
   14. メアリー・リーバイ (Alice Levy):
   15. ワシントン州での会議の女性:
   16. ホイットリー・ストリーバー (Whitley Strieber):
   17. ジョン・ミュアー・メディカル・ホスピタルの医師たち:
   18. ベトナムの狙撃手:
   19. サイトハンター:
   20. カジノの従業員（フェニックス）:
   21. マイク・クレベル (Mike Clellon):
   22. ダレル・シムズの母親:
   23. ダレル・シムズの息子:
   24. デイブ・マーラー (Dave Marler):
7. エイリアンの種類（エンティティ）
   1. 小型グレイ (Little Gray):
   2. 背の高いグレイ (Taller Gray):
   3. 爬虫類型 (Reptile):
   4. カマキリ型 (Praying Mantis):
   5. ビッグフット (Bigfoot):
8. 広範なエイリアン現象と政府の関与についての見解
9. ET 遭遇と証拠
   1. Derrel Sims氏の背景と動機
   2. エイリアンとの遭遇とUFO目撃
   3. エイリアンの性質と知性
   4. エイリアン遭遇の証拠と調査手法
   5. 遭遇阻止と防止策
   6. 政府の関与と情報隠蔽
   7. エイリアン「プログラム」の目的と終焉
   8. まとめ
10. implant 現象
11. 記憶のブロックの偽の記憶
12. 政府の UFO に関する知識
13. scoop mark と‌「強烈な紫外線」‌の関係
14. 閃光を放つ UFO に遭遇 → 直後に巨大なフクロウに遭遇
15. 米軍狙撃手の証言：ベトナム戦争中に北ベトナム軍を指揮していた ET を射殺した
16. 情報源
    1. 動画概要欄
17. 文字起こし

音声対話

AI

https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/c6a43232-7613-4870-892e-1389eedd4d06/audio

詳細

AI

詳細ブリーフィングドキュメント: エイリアンハンターの視点：接触と証拠 / 宇宙人とインプラントの謎

このブリーフィングドキュメントは、提供されたソース「エイリアンハンターの視点：接触と証拠」および「宇宙人とインプラントの謎」に基づいて、デレル・シムズ氏の経験、調査、そしてUFOとエイリアンの接触現象に関する見解をレビューするものです。

主要なテーマと重要な事実

デレル・シムズ氏は、幼少期の個人的な遭遇をきっかけにUFO・エイリアン現象の調査を始めた「エイリアンハンター」として知られています。彼の活動は、直接的な身体的証拠の収集と、UFO現象に関する従来のパラダイムへの挑戦に焦点を当てています。

1. 個人的な遭遇とUFOの目撃

• 幼少期の遭遇: シムズ氏は4歳の時（1952年、テキサス州ミッドランド）に「エンティティ」が部屋を出ていくのを目撃しました。そのエンティティは口を使わずに「目が覚めた」と伝えてきたと述べています。「細身の小さな男」で、性器やへそ、乳腺がなく、人間とは異なる存在であることに幼心に驚いたと語っています。この経験が彼の後の調査の原点となっています。(0:16:22, 0:36:15)

• 繰り返し目撃されるUFO: シムズ氏は生涯で50回以上のUFOを目撃しています。「常に探している」ため、多くの目撃経験があると説明しています。(0:17:15, 0:17:41)

• 目撃されたUFOの形状:

  • 三角形の物体: 1980年代初頭にホワイトサンズ・ミサイル射場とホロマン空軍基地近くで「巨大な三角形の物体」を目撃。星を隠すほど大きく、「焼けた燃料のオレンジ色の痕跡」があったにもかかわらず、「音を全く立てなかった」ことに衝撃を受けたと述べています。(0:23:30, 0:24:09)
  • 葉巻型の物体: アラモゴードの自宅近くで、母と共に「葉巻型の乗り物」を目撃。これも「ヘリコプターではなかった、音を全く立てなかった」と強調しています。この目撃には30～40人の目撃者がいたと推定しています。(0:25:22, 0:26:03)

• 目撃の特性: シムズ氏の目撃経験は、目に見える形状だけでなく、「音がしない」という共通の特徴を強く示しており、これは従来の航空機とは異なる「パラダイムに合わない」現象として彼の関心を深めました。(0:24:41, 0:25:12)

2. エイリアンハンターとしての活動と動機

-「エイリアンハンター」の由来: この呼称は、アトランタでのジャーナリストのインタビュー中に、「あなたは彼らを狩るからエイリアンハンターね」と言われたことから定着しました。(0:28:51)

• 個人的な動機: シムズ氏がエイリアンを「狩る」理由は、彼らがシムズ氏本人、そして後に彼の息子を「狩った」からだと述べています。「私に対して何をしても構わないが、私の子供たちに手を出せば、私は追いかける」と強い決意を表明しています。(0:29:18)
• 目標: 最終的に「彼らのうちの一匹を捕獲すること」を目指しており、すでに3度「捕まえそうになった」経験があるとのことです。(0:29:47)
• DNAサンプルと物理的証拠: すでに「これらのエンティティからのDNAサンプル」を保有しており、「物理的証拠」の収集に力を入れています。(0:29:47)

3. 遭遇したエンティティの種類と知性

• 「モロン」レベルの知性: 自身の最後の遭遇で見たエンティティは「頭が体のおよそ3分の1」ほどの大きさで、身長は「3フィートから3フィート半」程度でした。これらの小さなエンティティは「IQが約80から85」で、「モロンのIQ」に相当すると非常に低い知性レベルにあると主張しています。(0:34:50)
• ドローン説: この低い知性レベルについて、「これは一種のドローン」として機能している可能性があるという見方を示しています。(0:36:07)
• 7種類の主要なエンティティ: シムズ氏は、「小さなグレイ」、「背の高いグレイ（医者またはボスと呼ばれることが多い）」、「レプティリアン」、「カマキリのような存在」、そして「ビッグフット」の7種類の主要なエンティティが存在すると考えています。これらのエンティティは、「人類との相互作用のために作られ、孵化され、クローン化され、または製造されたモデル」であるとの見解を述べています。(0:37:04)
• 高い知性のエンティティ: 「医者タイプ」のエイリアン（小さなグレイに似ているがIQが140～150）や、「カマキリタイプ」（IQが160～180）、「ノルディックタイプ」と呼ばれる人間型のエイリアンは非常に高い知性を持つとされています。(1:52:58)

4. 物理的証拠の発見

エイリアン蛍光（Alien Fluorescence）:

• 発見: 1992年に初めて発見されました。シムズ氏が患者の女性をブラックライトで検査した際に、彼女の腕の内側に「マンデルブロ集合」のような「明るい青色の」模様を発見しました。これは「接触時にエイリアンが分泌する汗のような物質」が皮膚に浸透することで形成されると考えています。(0:39:16)
• 特徴: 洗っても落ちず、「本物」であれば接触時に皮膚に浸透します。3本指の跡などの「カジュアルな接触」を示すものや、意図的に付けられた「手続上のマーキング」として見られることがあります。(0:40:09, 0:40:40)
• DNAサンプル: シムズ氏は「エイリアンからのDNA蛍光のサンプル」を15個保有しており、これらをエイリアンの「指紋」や「DNA」と見なしています。この分析には高額な費用がかかると述べています。(1:29:06)

インプラント:

• 個人的な体験: シムズ氏自身の最初のインプラント体験は12歳の時でした。鼻腔に「小さな銀色の球体」が付いた「約8インチの針のような装置」を挿入され、骨を折られるという「恐ろしい」ものでした。この球体は後に除去されたとのことです。(0:42:54, 1:08:50)
• インプラントの回収事例: ある母親から、娘の鼻から出てきた「ピンの頭くらいの大きさの小さな金色の球体」の報告を受け、それを回収し分析に回しました。
• 分析結果: ヨーク大学のニック・ビラキス博士の下での分析では、この球体は「小さな月で、クレーターがそこらじゅうにある」ように見え、レプリケート不能であるとされました。組成は「49%が金で51%が銀」であり、現在「金属が地球外起源かどうかの同位体比テスト」を計画中であると述べています。(1:09:48, 1:12:33)

インプラントの機能（推測）:

• 神経伝達物質の操作: インプラントの一部は、「セロトニン、ドーパミン、さらにはカリウム」といった神経伝達物質を「変更している可能性」が示唆されています。これが事実であれば、インプラントを介して人間の「幸福、悲しみ、抑うつ」をコントロールできることになり、「彼らがあなたを所有している」とシムズ氏は述べています。(1:26:01)
• データ転送: 「データのアップロードまたはダウンロード」に使用されている可能性も考えられています。(1:27:11)
• 蛍光DNAタグ付け: エイリアン蛍光と関連して、「蛍光DNAタグ付け」というハイテクなプロセスの一部である可能性も視野に入れています。(1:27:11)
• インプラントの稀少性: シムズ氏は、インプラントは「極めて稀」であると強調しており、多くの被誘拐者がインプラントを持っていると信じているが、実際に発見されることは少ないと述べています。(1:25:06)

スクープマーク:

• 特徴: シムズ氏自身のすねには「5/8インチの巨大なスクープマーク」があり、これは4歳の時にできたと述べています。これは「強烈な紫外線」によって引き起こされる「ソーラーエラストーシス」と呼ばれる現象で、傷口が急速に焼灼される（カテーテル処理される）と説明しています。(1:36:53)
• 虚偽記憶: スクープマークの体験に付随する「転んで怪我をした」という記憶は、「スクリーンメモリ」と呼ばれる「真実と一致しないイメージ」であると指摘しています。(1:37:52, 1:34:58)

5. 誘拐への対抗策

• エイリアンの脆弱性: シムズ氏は、エイリアンは「全能ではない」、「彼らは3Dにいるとき、あなたと同じくらい脆弱である」と主張しています。彼らが人間を麻痺させたり、恐れさせたり、畏敬の念を抱かせたりするのは、「人間が反応したり、身を守ったりできないようにするため」だと説明しています。(0:44:39)
• 「ミッキーマウスクラブ」の歌: 小さなグレイタイプのエイリアンに対して非常に効果的な方法として、子供たちに「ミッキーマウスクラブの歌」や、どんな歌でも良いので「馬鹿げた言葉を使い続け、彼らが脳にアクセスできないように集中すること」を勧めています。これによりエイリアンは「気が狂いそうになり、最終的に諦める」と語っています。(0:45:04)
• 野球のバット: 16歳の少女がベッド脇に置いていた野球のバットを見て、「もっと大きなバットが必要だ」と述べ、「ナンセンスな言葉を使うことや、彼らがあなたの脳にアクセスできないように自分を集中させること」が重要だと改めて強調しています。(0:47:37)

6. 政府とUFO現象

• CIAでの経験: シムズ氏は元軍警察、警察官、そしてCIA工作員でした。CIAにいた間（1968年）、UFOやエイリアンの話題は「水飲み場の話」には出なかったと述べています。(0:49:17)
• 政府の知識の限定性: 彼の見解では、「政府は何も知らない」と断言しています。知っているのは「海軍情報局、空軍、中央情報局、NSA内部の秘密組織（カバル）」だけであり、「彼らは選ばれた人間ではないので、誰にも何も話す義務はない」と述べています。大統領からも隠しているとさえ言及しています。(0:58:08)
• DSP衛星システム: シムズ氏は元DSP（Defense Systems Programs）衛星の専門家と会談した際、DSP衛星が「赤外線、紫外線、可視光線の3つの目」を持っていることを知りました。その専門家は「ファストウォーカー」や「スローウォーカー」と呼ばれる現象の記録を全て持っており、「アメリカ政府がUFOとのあらゆる接触イベントの第一級証拠を持っている」ことを認めたと述べています。(1:06:15, 1:07:06)

7. インプラント除去手術と研究

• 手術の数: シムズ氏はこれまでに25回のインプラント除去手術を実施または監督してきました。(1:17:53)
• ロジャー・リアー博士の役割: 故ロジャー・リアー博士について、彼は足専門医であり、実際には足の手術を1回行っただけで、他のインプラント手術はMD（医師）を雇って行わせていたと明かしています。リアー博士は自身が手術を行っているように見せかけていたと述べています。(1:08:10)
• 手術の費用: シムズ氏のインプラント関連の活動は「完全に慈善事業」であり、「被誘拐者から手術の費用を一切徴収していない」と強調しています。自身の不動産投資からの資金で賄っており、「家族はほとんどの場合、この活動で破産状態」にあると述べています。(1:13:39)
• 催眠麻酔（Hypnotic Anesthesia）: 手術において患者の痛みを和らげるために「催眠麻酔」を使用しています。これにより、局所麻酔や全身麻酔なしで手術を受けられるか、または最小限の使用で済むと説明しています。また、催眠麻酔を受けた患者は「通常の外科手術より3～5倍早く治る」と述べています。(1:14:18, 1:15:20)
• 研究の課題: 取得した証拠の科学的分析には多額の資金が必要であり、特に「DNA蛍光」のテストは1回あたり14,000ドル以上かかると述べています。(1:29:06)

8. その他の興味深い情報

• エイリアンの「プログラム」の終焉: 1992年の大規模な誘拐事件で得られた情報によると、「エイリアンプログラムは最後の100年に入っている」とされ、エイリアン側は「チェックメイトでゲームオーバー、彼らは負けた」と考えているとシムズ氏は解釈しています。彼らは人類を納得させようと「他の世界から来たエイリアンだ」と説得しようとしてきたが、彼らが望んだ結果は得られなかったようです。(1:51:19, 1:53:25)

• 虚偽記憶（False Memory Syndrome）: エイリアンは被誘拐者の記憶に「ブロック」を設置したり、「偽りの記憶」を植え付けたりすることがあります。例えば、「3フィートのフクロウ」や「巨大な鹿」を見たという記憶は、実際には「大きな黒い目をした何か」だったものを置き換えたものであると説明しています。(1:55:08)

• エイリアンの遭遇事例（軍人・ハンター）:

  • ベトナムの狙撃兵: ベトナムの狙撃兵がスターライトスコープで北ベトナム将校との会議中に「バグ」と呼ばれるエイリアンを目撃し、そのエイリアンが会議の「主導権を握っていた」と報告。狙撃兵がエイリアンを撃ったところ、「頭が爆発した」が、それは「誰にでも起こることだ」と述べています。(1:38:39, 1:40:34)
  • サイトハンター: あるハンターが森で「7フィートのプレイングマンティス（カマキリのような存在）」を目撃し、撃ったところ弾丸は命中したが、「消えた」と報告。シムズ氏は、UFOが丘の向こうにいて、エイリアンが光線で転送される寸前にハンターに撃たれたため、急いで船内に戻されたと推測しています。(1:41:56, 1:42:41)

• 「エイリアンハンター」の調査プロトコル: シムズ氏は被誘拐者の証言の真実性を評価するために厳格なプロトコルを使用しています。警察官としての経験から、筆跡分析やボディランゲージの観察、特定の描画テストなどを通じて、虚偽の証言を見抜くと述べています。(1:45:32)

• ロバート・ビゲロー氏との関係: ロバート・ビゲロー氏が初期のインプラント手術3件の資金を提供したと述べています。ビゲロー氏は「情報収集者」であり、「NASAをも超える」インフレータブル宇宙ステーションを持つ航空宇宙企業を所有していると評価しています。(1:30:49, 1:31:13)

• 情報公開: 手術の映像をウェブサイトで公開する予定ですが、過去に著作権を侵害された経験があるため、現状では公開していません。(1:49:06)

結論

デレル・シムズ氏のブリーフィングは、UFOやエイリアンとの接触現象が単なる視覚的な目撃に留まらず、物理的な証拠（インプラント、蛍光物質、スクープマーク）を伴う「侵入的な出来事」であるという彼の信念を強調しています。

彼の調査は、従来の科学界や政府の認識とは一線を画しており、エイリアンの知性、その目的、そして人類への影響について独自の、時には物議を醸す見解を提供しています。特に、エイリアンの多様性、その知性レベルの幅広さ、そして彼らが人類との相互作用のために「作られた」存在であるという考えは、この分野における重要な視点を提供しています。

彼の活動は、UFO現象を単なる空の光としてではなく、より深く、物理的なレベルで理解しようとする試みとして位置づけられます。

時系列

AI

ダレル・シムズ氏の個人的なUFO/エイリアンとの遭遇と研究活動

• 1952年（4歳）: テキサス州ミッドランドの自宅で、初めてのエイリアンとの遭遇を経験。細身の、生殖器やへそがないエンティティが部屋を去るのを目撃し、そのエンティティが口を使わずに「目が覚めた」と語るのを聞く。

• 1960年（12歳）: 自宅で母親の声を幻聴で聞き、家の外の「新しい星」を見るように促される。その後、光に引き寄せられ、円形の部屋でエイリアンに捕らえられ、麻酔なしで鼻腔に針のような装置でインプラントを挿入されるという恐ろしい体験をする。これがインプラント現象との最初の出会いとなる。

• 1960年〜1967年頃（4歳半から17歳まで）: エイリアンによる遭遇が頻繁に起こる。

• 1966年: ニューメキシコ州立大学で初の武道学校を設立し、陸軍・空軍のROTCプログラムで「エアコマンドー」や「ブラックベレー」を指導。

• 1967年頃（17歳）: エイリアンとの遭遇が「非常に暴力的に」終わり、それ以降遭遇はなくなる。この最後の遭遇には5体のエンティティが現れたが、それらはUFO文献には登場しない種類だった。この経験は彼に深いトラウマを残し、同様の経験をした8人全員が心的外傷を負っていたことを後に発見する。

• 1968年: CIAの秘密基地で軍事警察官として勤務中、武道クラスの生徒である若い女性からエイリアンの誘拐について相談を受ける。この女性は「紫色の光」と「悪夢」について語り、シムズ氏はこれがエイリアン誘拐の被害者との最初の出会いとなる。彼はすぐに駆けつけると約束し、誘拐された人々を助けることに意識を向けるようになる。

• 1980年代初頭: ニューメキシコ州アラモゴルドのホロマン空軍基地付近で、大型の三角形の物体が音もなく空を横切るのを目撃。これは彼の多くのUFO目撃の一つとなる。

• 時期不明（幼少期、おそらく4歳頃）: 誘拐時にスプーン状の痕（スクープマーク）を左足に負う。これは強い紫外線によってできた「ソーラー・エラストーシス」という火傷であると後に判明する。

• 1992年: エイリアンとの物理的接触によって残る「エイリアンの蛍光体」（主に3本指の形状）を患者の女性（「非常に醜い」と感じていたが、実際は美しい女性）の腕の内側で発見する。これは接触によって皮膚に浸透する分泌物であることが判明し、マンデルブロ集合のような青い模様として現れる。

• 1995年: コロラド州ガニソンのスノーマス・ウィルダネスでエイリアンを捕獲する試みを行う。誘拐被害者を「おとり」として利用し、7人の調査員を同行させる。この時、身長3～3.5フィートで頭が体長の約3分の1という、これまでに見たことのないエンティティをテントの外で目撃し、精神的にコミュニケーションをとる。このエンティティの知能指数は80〜85程度と推測する。

• 初期のインプラント摘出手術（時期不明、おそらく1990年代後半）: ロジャー・リア博士と共に最初の2回のインプラント摘出手術を行う。当初、リア博士は懐疑的だったが、摘出された物体に対する病理検査の結果（炎症反応なし、ケラチン質の物質）により、エイリアン由来の可能性が示唆される。

• 後続の3回のインプラント摘出手術（初期の2回手術後）: ロバート・ビゲロー氏がこれらの手術に資金を提供する。

• 時期不明（インプラント摘出後）: 摘出された4つの物体がロスアラモス国立研究所とニューメキシコ工科大学で分析され、それらが地球外起源であり、ウィットマンステッテンまたはヤウチョンの珍しい隕石の物質に由来することが判明する。しかし、リア博士が研究のブラインド（盲検）を破り、ロスアラモスに電話して結果を尋ねたことで、研究結果が改ざんされる事態となる。

• 時期不明（マサチューセッツ州ボストン、ジョン・F・ケネディ図書館での講演後）: 記者から「エイリアンハンター」というあだ名をつけられ、それが定着する。

• 時期不明（会議後）: MDの友人からの電話で、ジョン・ミュアー・メディカル・ホスピタルで250人の医師を対象に「人間とエイリアンの接触による医学的合併症：インプラント」というテーマで講演を行う。この講演はAMA（米国医師会）が後援し、継続教育プログラムとして認定されていた。

• 時期不明（インドでの手術の約3ヶ月前）: インドでインプラント摘出手術を行う。

主要関係者

AI

ダレル・シムズ (Darrel Sims):

自らを「エイリアンハンター」と称する。4歳の頃からエイリアンとの遭遇を経験し、12歳でインプラントを埋め込まれる。元軍事警察官、警察官、CIAの秘密作戦員（スパイ訓練所のトップシークレットセキュリティ担当、武道および武器教官）。ニューメキシコ州立大学で初の武道学校を設立した。誘拐された人々を助けることを使命とし、エイリアンによるインプラントの摘出手術を25回以上実施し、関連する物理的証拠（エイリアンの蛍光体、DNAサンプル、インプラントなど）を収集・分析している。エイリアンのプログラムとその終焉、インプラントの機能、エイリアンの知能などについて独自の理論を展開している。彼の研究は自己資金で行われており、患者からは一切費用を徴収しない「慈善的」な活動である。

ロジャー・リア (Dr. Roger Leir):

足病医。ダレル・シムズ氏と共に初期のインプラント摘出手術に関わった人物。シムズ氏によれば、リア博士自身が手術を行ったのは足の1回だけで、他の手術はMD（医師）を雇って行っていた。シムズ氏の証言によれば、リア博士はインプラント研究の「盲検」を破り、その結果、研究報告が改ざんされる原因を作った。後にカリフォルニア州足病学委員会から免許停止処分を受けた。

ロバート・ビゲロー (Robert Bigelow):

実業家であり、宇宙産業の所有者。ダレル・シムズ氏のインプラント摘出手術に資金を提供した。シムズ氏によれば、彼はNASAを超える独自のインフレータブル宇宙ステーションを持つなど、非常に成功している。情報を収集することに熱心である。

スタン・フリードマン (Stanton Friedman):

核物理学者であり、UFO研究家。ダレル・シムズ氏の語る「ベトナムの狙撃手」の話に強く興味を示し、「これまで聞いたことがない」と述べた。

アレハンドロ (Alejandro):

番組に電話をかけてきた人物。「フェニックス・インシデント」という映画の特別上映について告知した。ダレル・シムズ氏とは親交がある。

ホスト（マーティン）:

番組の進行役。ダレル・シムズ氏の過去の経歴や研究内容について質問し、視聴者からの質問を伝える。

マシュー (Matthew):

メッセージボードからの質問者。エイリアンの蛍光体の発見について、また、ダレル・シムズ氏から聞いた軍人がスナイパースコープでエイリアンを見た話について質問する。

クリス (Chris):

メッセージボードからの質問者。誘拐被害者の特定と証拠収集のためのプロトコルについて質問する。

フィリップ (Phil):

メッセージボードからの質問者。エイリアンのインプラントが周波数を送信しているかどうか、帯域幅は何かを質問する。

ドナ (Donna):

電話で質問を寄せてきたリスナー。インプラントの実際の機能についてダレル・シムズ氏の見解を質問する。

デイビッド・ジェイコブス (David Jacobs):

UFO研究家、歴史学者。ダレル・シムズ氏の功績を認め、彼が提示した証拠に驚きを示した。シムズ氏によれば、ジェイコブスの「ハイブリダイゼーション」という基本的な説に対しては、エイリアン自身の情報に基づき、そのプログラムが「終わろうとしている」という点で異なる見解を持っている。

ジョン・マック (Dr. John Mack):

ハーバード大学の精神科医。エイリアン誘拐の症例を研究したことで知られる。シムズ氏の講演内容について「医者に対してあのような講演をしたことはない」と認めたとされる。

ニック・ビラキス (Dr. Nick Bilakis):

ヨーク大学の教授。シムズ氏が送った小さな金色の球体（少女の鼻から出たインプラント）を分析した。この教授は当初懐疑的だったが、物体を再現できず、その起源に疑問を抱いた。

メアリー・リーバイ (Alice Levy):

ロジャー・リア博士とダレル・シムズ氏の共通の友人。リア博士にシムズ氏の言葉に耳を傾けるよう説得した人物。

ワシントン州での会議の女性:

催眠療法士であり、ダレル・シムズ氏が「マスター催眠療法士」「医療催眠療法士」「催眠麻酔療法士」であることを知り、驚いた。

ホイットリー・ストリーバー (Whitley Strieber):

誘拐体験を著書にした作家。ダレル・シムズ氏の催眠麻酔を用いた手術現場に立ち会った。

ジョン・ミュアー・メディカル・ホスピタルの医師たち:

ダレル・シムズ氏の「医学的合併症：インプラント」に関する講演に出席した医師たち。3人の医師は講演に感銘を受け、彼の研究に協力するようになった。

ベトナムの狙撃手:

ダレル・シムズ氏に連絡を取った元米軍の狙撃手。北ベトナム将校との会合中に、スターライトスコープを通して「虫のようなもの」を目撃し、それを撃ち殺したと語った。彼の話は、エイリアンが「モデル」であり、人間との相互作用のために作られたというシムズ氏の理論を裏付けるものとなった。

サイトハンター:

ダレル・シムズ氏に連絡を取ったハンター。コロラド州デンバーでの会議で、7フィートのカマキリ型のエイリアンをライフルで撃ち、その直後にエイリアンが消滅したと報告した。

カジノの従業員（フェニックス）:

フェニックスのUFO会議の休憩中にダレル・シムズ氏と話した女性。彼女と友人がホピの国でUFOを目撃し、その後に「車ほどの大きさのフクロウ」が車のフロントガラスに突進してきたという奇妙な体験を語った。

マイク・クレベル (Mike Clellon):

フクロウとUFO現象の関連性について研究している人物。ダレル・シムズ氏はこのカジノ従業員の体験談を彼に伝えた。

ダレル・シムズの母親:

ダレル・シムズが12歳の時に、彼に「新しい星」を見るように促す声を（幻聴で）聞いた人物。

ダレル・シムズの息子:

エイリアンに「狩られた」とシムズ氏が語る人物。これがシムズ氏がエイリアンを「狩る」原動力となった。

デイブ・マーラー (Dave Marler):

三角形のUFOに関する書籍を出版した人物。

エイリアンの種類（エンティティ）

AI

小型グレイ (Little Gray):

生殖器、へそ、乳腺がないエンティティ。知能指数は約80〜85と低く、シムズ氏によれば「モロン（愚か者）」のIQに相当する。人間との相互作用のために「作られた、孵化された、クローン化された、または製造されたモデル」であるとされている。

背の高いグレイ (Taller Gray):

「医者」または「ボス」と呼ばれる。知能指数は140〜150程度と高い。

爬虫類型 (Reptile):

シムズ氏が認識する「7つの主要なエンティティ」の一つ。

カマキリ型 (Praying Mantis):

知能指数は160〜180程度と高い。シムズ氏の物語に登場する「サイトハンター」が遭遇した7フィートのエンティティ。

ビッグフット (Bigfoot):

シムズ氏が認識する「7つの主要なエンティティ」の一つ。 ヒューマン型/ノルディック型 (Human types / Nordic type): 非常に知能が高いとされている。

広範なエイリアン現象と政府の関与についての見解

AI

• 継続的なUFO目撃: 生涯で50回以上のUFO目撃がある。その中には、ホロマン空軍基地近くで目撃された3つの赤橙色の円盤や、妻が16歳の時にアラモゴルドで目撃した金属製のUFO、また彼と約30～40人の目撃者が目撃した葉巻型の物体などが含まれる。
• CIAでの経験: CIA勤務中、エイリアンの話題は「水飲み場の話」にはならず、政府の大部分はUFOについて何も知らないと考えている。しかし、海軍情報局、空軍、中央情報局、NSAの内部の「カバル」（陰謀団）は知っているが、彼らは情報を一般に公開することはないと主張する。
• DSP衛星システム: Defense Systems Programs（DSP）衛星システムは、高速ウォーカー（Fast Walkers）や低速ウォーカー（Slow Walkers）として知られるUFOのすべての接触イベントを記録していると、DSP衛星の専門家から聞かされる。これらの衛星は赤外線、紫外線、可視光線の「3つの目」を持っている。
• エイリアンのDNAと「指紋」: エイリアンのDNAサンプルを15種類保有しており、これをエイリアンの「指紋」と呼んでいる。しかし、その分析には高額な費用がかかり、自己資金で賄っている。
• インプラントの機能: インプラントは非常に稀であると強調する。その機能については、神経伝達物質（セロトニン、ドーパミン、カリウムなど）を変化させ、人間の感情や精神状態をコントロールする可能性、またはデータのアップロード/ダウンロードに使用される可能性、さらには蛍光DNAタグ付けに関与する可能性を指摘する。
• エイリアンの知能: 捕獲しようとした小型グレイの知能指数は80〜85程度であり、彼らは創造され、孵化し、クローン化され、または製造された「モデル」であると主張する。一方、背の高いグレイ（「博士」や「ボス」と呼ばれる）、爬虫類型、カマキリ型、ビッグフット型ははるかに高い知能（IQ 140〜180）を持っていると述べる。
• エイリアンのプログラムの終焉: 1992年の大規模誘拐事件で得た「インテル」（情報）によれば、エイリアンのプログラムは「最後の100年」に入っており、それは6000年間続いてきたものだと推測する。彼らの目的は人類との「接触」であり、その目的は達成されていないと考える。
• 偽の記憶（スクリーンメモリー）: エイリアンが誘拐被害者の記憶を操作し、「3フィートのフクロウ」や「巨大な鹿」といった偽の記憶を植え付けていると主張する。これは誘拐事件の真実を隠蔽するためのエイリアンによる「最高の偽記憶症候群」であると考える。

ET 遭遇と証拠

AI

Derrel Sims氏（エイリアンハンター）のより大きな文脈において、提供された情報源は、エイリアンとの遭遇と証拠について包括的な視点を提供しています。シムズ氏は、個人の体験、科学的手法、そして独自の調査プロトコルを組み合わせて、エイリアンとの接触の性質と証拠の収集に取り組んでいます。

Derrel Sims氏の背景と動機

Derrel Sims氏は「エイリアンハンター」として知られていますが、この呼称は彼自身が名付けたものではなく、アトランタのジャーナリストによって付けられたものです。彼がエイリアンを「狩る」という動機は、彼自身が幼い頃から経験した遭遇と、後に彼の息子も標的になったことにあります。シムズ氏の信念は‌‌「彼らは私を狙いに来た。今度は私が彼らを狙う」‌‌というもので、最終的にはエイリアンの捕獲を目指しており、すでに3度捕獲に成功しそうになったと述べています。

エイリアンとの遭遇とUFO目撃

シムズ氏のエイリアン遭遇は‌‌4歳の時‌‌に始まりました。1952年にテキサス州ミッドランドで、部屋を出ていく「やせ細った小さな男」を目撃しました。その存在は彼が考えていることを察し、「起きている」と口を使わずに言ったと語っています。彼のイベントは4歳半から17歳まで続き、‌‌最後の遭遇は非常に暴力的‌‌で、その後は二度と遭遇しなかったといいます。

UFOの目撃に関しては、シムズ氏は‌‌生涯で50回以上‌‌のUFOを目撃しており、常に空を見上げていると述べています。彼が目撃したUFOには以下の特徴があります。

• ‌‌大型の三角形の物体‌‌: 1980年代初頭に、ホワイトサンズ・ミサイル射撃場とホロマン空軍基地付近で目撃されました。星を遮るほどの大きさで、音がなく、燃焼燃料のオレンジ色の痕跡があったといいます。
• ‌‌葉巻型の物体‌‌: ホロマン空軍基地近くで、シムズ氏の母と妻を含む30～40人の目撃者が確認しました。この物体も音を立てず、空中に静止したり、少し動いたりしたとされます。この葉巻型の物体は、ディスクが横向きになったものという説には同意せず、はっきりと異なる形状であり、中には「舷窓」を持つものもいたと述べています。

エイリアンの性質と知性

シムズ氏は、自身が遭遇したエイリアンが、‌‌人間との相互作用のために作られた「モデル」‌‌であるという考えを持っています。彼は、性器やへそがないことから、これらの存在が生まれてきたのではなく、‌‌「孵化、クローン化、製造、または作られた」‌‌ものだと推測しています。彼が認識している「7つの主要なエンティティ」として、「小さなグレイ」、「背の高いグレイ（医者またはボスと呼ばれることが多い）」、「レプティリアン」、「カマキリ」、「ビッグフット」を挙げています。

特に、彼がキャンプ中に遭遇した‌‌「小さなグレイ」は知性が低く、IQが80～85程度で「愚か者」のレベル‌‌だと表現しています。これが、エイリアンがイベント後に人々を服を裏返しに着させたり、靴を左右逆に履かせたり、家の外に放置したりするような混乱を引き起こす理由だと考えています。しかし、別のタイプのエイリアン、例えば「医者タイプ」のグレイはIQが140～150、カマキリは160～180と、非常に高い知性を持つものもいると述べています。この知性の差は、低知性の存在が「ドローン」のような役割を果たしている可能性を示唆しています。

エイリアンは、3次元空間では人間と同じくらい脆弱であり、人間が麻痺したり、恐怖や畏敬の念を抱くことで行動不能になることを好むとシムズ氏は指摘します。

エイリアン遭遇の証拠と調査手法

シムズ氏は、物理的証拠の収集に重点を置いており、その‌‌画期的な発見‌‌として「エイリアン蛍光」と「インプラント」を挙げています。

• ‌‌エイリアン蛍光（Alien Fluorescence）‌‌:
  • ‌‌発見‌‌: 1992年に女性へのインタビュー中に発見されました。ブラックライトを当てると、‌‌マンデルブロ集合‌‌（数学的な構造でハートのような形）の形をした明るい青色の蛍光が、彼女の腕の内側に見られました。
  • ‌‌性質‌‌: この蛍光物質は、エイリアンが物理的に接触した際に分泌される汗のような物質であり、‌‌接触すると皮膚に浸透し、洗い落とすことができません‌‌。指の形（3本指）などの「偶発的接触」の痕跡や、意図的に付けられた「処置マーキング」として現れることがあります。
• ‌‌インプラント（Implants）‌‌:
  • ‌‌シムズ氏自身の体験‌‌: 1960年、12歳の時に自身もインプラントの被害者となりました。鼻腔に約8インチの針状の装置が挿入され、先端の銀色の球体が体内に残されたといいます。後にその球体は体外に出ていったと推定されています。
  • ‌‌インプラントの回収と分析‌‌:
    • ‌‌希少性‌‌: シムズ氏は、世間の認識とは異なり、インプラントは‌‌極めて稀なもの‌‌であると強調しています。毎年何百ものX線写真を調べていますが、インプラントが発見されることはほとんどありません。
    • ‌‌回収例‌‌: サウスダコタ州での会議で、エイリアンに鼻に何かを入れられたと訴える少女の母親に、ティッシュでくしゃみをさせるよう指示したところ、‌‌ピンの頭ほどの大きさの金色の球体4つ‌‌が発見されました。
    • ‌‌科学的分析‌‌: ヨーク大学のニック・ビラキス博士の監修のもと、これらの球体を分析しました。教授はこれを複製できないと述べ、‌‌「クレーターのある小さな月」のような形‌‌をしていると表現しました。分析の結果、‌‌金49%と銀51%‌‌で構成されていることが判明しました。
    • ‌‌起源‌‌: ロスアラモスとニューメキシコ工科大学による研究では、インプラントの物質が‌‌地球外起源‌‌であり、ウィットマンシュタッテン（Wittmannstatten）またはヤウチャン（Yauchung）隕石のような‌‌珍しい隕石‌‌に由来することが示されました。
    • ‌‌外科的摘出‌‌: シムズ氏は、これまでに‌‌25回のインプラント摘出手術‌‌を実施または監督してきました。彼の調査チームは外科医を雇い、彼は「催眠麻酔療法士」として患者の麻酔や治癒促進を担当します。手術の映像も記録されており、炎症反応がなく、体内には通常見られないケラチン物質が物体を囲んでいたことが病理報告で確認されています。
  • ‌‌インプラントの機能‌‌:
    • ‌‌神経伝達物質の操作‌‌: インプラントの中には、セロトニン、ドーパミン、カリウムといった神経伝達物質を変化させるものがある可能性が指摘されています。これにより、エイリアンが人々の‌‌幸福、悲しみ、抑うつ‌‌などをコントロールしている可能性があります。
    • ‌‌データアップロード/ダウンロード‌‌: データ転送のプロセスに関与している可能性も検討されています。
    • ‌‌DNA蛍光タグ付け‌‌: 蛍光物質が関与するDNAタグ付けの可能性も調査中です。
• ‌‌スクープマーク（Scoop Marks）‌‌:
  • シムズ氏自身も4歳の時に脛に5/8インチの大きなスクープマークができ、治癒が速かったと述べています。
  • スクープマークは‌‌強力な紫外線によって引き起こされる‌‌「太陽エラストーシス（solar elastosis）」によるもので、傷が急速に焼灼（しょうしゃく）されると説明しています。
  • 目撃者の中には、鉛筆のような装置が皮膚を切り取り、明るい光で傷を焼灼するのを見たという人もいます。
• ‌‌エイリアンのDNA‌‌:
  • シムズ氏は、‌‌エイリアンのDNA蛍光サンプルを15個‌‌持っており、これをエイリアンの「指紋」でありDNAであると表現しています。この分析には非常に高額な費用がかかるとのことです。

遭遇阻止と防止策

シムズ氏はエイリアンが「万能」ではないことを強調し、遭遇を阻止するヒントも提供しています。子供向けの方法としては、‌‌「ミッキーマウスマーチ」のようなナンセンスな歌を歌い続ける‌‌ことで、エイリアンが脳にアクセスするのを防ぎ、彼らを苛立たせて諦めさせることができると述べています。これはエイリアンが脳にアクセスできないように集中力を保つという考えに基づいています。

政府の関与と情報隠蔽

シムズ氏は元軍警察官、警察官、そしてCIA工作員としての経歴を持っています。彼のCIAでの主な仕事は、CIA施設の‌‌最高機密セキュリティ‌‌と、格闘技・武器のインストラクターでした。彼はCIA内部でのエイリアンやUFOに関する情報の広がりについて以下のように述べています。

• ‌‌知識の偏り‌‌: 政府全体がUFOについて知っているわけではないと断言しています。国防総省（DSP）、海軍情報部、空軍、CIA、NSAの内部の‌‌「カバル（秘密結社）」だけが真実を知っている‌‌と語ります。
• ‌‌DSP衛星の証拠‌‌: 彼と話した元DSP衛星の専門家によると、DSP衛星は赤外線、紫外線、可視光線の3つの目を持ち、‌‌「ファストウォーカー」や「スローウォーカー」（「空飛ぶ円盤」と同義）‌‌を常時追跡・記録しているといいます。これにより、‌‌米国政府はすべてのUFO接触イベントの「確実な証拠」を持っている‌‌とシムズ氏は考えています。

エイリアン「プログラム」の目的と終焉

シムズ氏の調査では、エイリアンが関与する‌‌「プログラム」が約6000年続いた‌‌と推測されており、現在その‌‌「最後の100年」にある‌‌という情報があります。これは、エイリアン自身が「人類との接触」プログラムが終わりに近づいていることを示唆しているとのことです。シムズ氏の見解では、このプログラムは「チェックメイトで、ゲームは終わり、彼らは負けた」状態であり、エイリアンは自分たちが成功すべきことを達成できなかったと考えています。

彼は、エイリアンが‌‌「他の世界からのエイリアンである」と私たちを納得させるために、あらゆる努力をしてきた‌‌と見ています。人々がエイリアン遭遇の記憶を取り戻し始めた時、彼らは記憶ブロックや‌‌「偽りの記憶症候群」‌‌（例えば「3フィートのフクロウ」や「巨大な鹿」を見たと思わせるもの）を導入し始めたと指摘しています。これは、エイリアンが自分たちの真の性質や目的を隠そうとしていることを示唆しています。

まとめ

Derrel Sims氏の視点から見ると、エイリアンとの遭遇と証拠は、単なる未確認飛行物体や未知の生物の現象にとどまらず、‌‌意図的に設計された異星人の「モデル」による、長期にわたる「プログラム」‌‌の一部として理解されます。彼は、エイリアンが人間との相互作用を管理し、記憶を操作し、人々の生理機能に影響を与えるための洗練された技術を使用していると見ています。彼の活動は、これら‌‌「モデル」の物理的痕跡（蛍光、インプラント）‌‌を科学的に収集し分析することで、エイリアン接触の現実と彼らの真の目的を解明しようとするものです。

シムズ氏の追求は、まるで複雑なパズルを解き明かす探偵のようです。それぞれの小さな証拠の断片、回収されたインプラント、目撃証言、そして政府の隠された情報さえもが、より大きな絵の一部となり、最終的に‌‌エイリアンの真の意図と彼らのプログラムの結末‌‌へとつながる手がかりを提供しているのです。

implant 現象

AI

Derrel Sims氏（エイリアンハンター）のより大きな文脈において、インプラント現象は彼の個人的な経験から始まり、科学的な調査、除去手術、そしてエイリアンの性質に関する彼独自の理論へと発展していく、彼のキャリアと研究の‌‌中心的なテーマ‌‌として位置づけられています。

以下に、ソースで提供された情報に基づき、この現象について詳しく説明します。

• ‌‌インプラント現象の発見と個人的経験‌‌

  • Derrel Sims氏のインプラント現象との最初の出会いは、彼自身の12歳のときの出来事でした。
  • 1960年の深夜、彼は母親の声に導かれるように外に出て、明るい光を見ました。次に意識を取り戻すと、彼は「スラブ」と呼ばれる傾斜した冷たいテーブルの上にある円形の部屋に横たわっていました。
  • そこで彼は捕獲者を目撃し、約20センチの針状の装置が鼻腔に挿入され、痛みもなく骨が折られた後、先端の銀色の球体が体内に残されたと述べています。これが彼にとってのインプラント現象との最初の経験でした。
  • 彼によれば、後にその球体は体外に出たとのことです。
  • この経験から、Sims氏は「私を狩った彼らを狩る」という使命感を抱き、「エイリアンハンター」としての活動を始めるきっかけとなりました。彼は「あなたは私を狙いに来た、今度は私があなたを狙いに行く」と述べ、最終的にはエイリアンを捕獲する意向を表明しています。

• ‌‌インプラントの性質と分析‌‌

  • Sims氏の研究では、インプラントは‌‌極めて稀‌‌であると強調しています。彼は毎年何百ものX線画像を調べていますが、インプラントが見つかることはほとんどないと述べています。
  • ある若い少女のケースでは、エイリアンが鼻に何かを入れたと訴え、くしゃみで‌‌金色の小さな球体‌‌（ピンの頭ほどの大きさ）が4つ排出されました。Sims氏がヨーク大学のニック・ビラキス博士に分析を依頼したところ、それらは複製不可能であり、‌‌クレーターのある小さな月のよう‌‌に見え、‌‌49%が金、51%が銀‌‌で構成されていることが判明しました。次のステップとして、これらの金属が地球外起源であるかを特定するために同位体比テストが必要とされています。
  • 除去された他の物体については、病理報告書が‌‌炎症反応の兆候がない‌‌ことを示し、‌‌ケラチン質の物質‌‌に囲まれていたことが判明しました。病理学者は、ケラチンが体の深部に見つからないため、これが起こりえないと困惑しました。
  • ロサンゼルス国立研究所とニューメキシコ工科大学による盲検研究では、2人の患者から除去された4つの物体が‌‌地球外起源‌‌であり、‌‌珍しい隕石‌‌（ウィトマンシュテッテンまたはヤウチョン隕石）に由来することが最終的に判明しました。この研究は、ロジャー・リアー博士がルールを破ってロサンゼルス研究所に接触し、「エイリアンインプラントを除去した者だ」と名乗ったことで、盲検性が損なわれ、報告書が変更される事態に至りました。

• ‌‌インプラントの機能とエイリアンの意図‌‌

  • インプラントは‌‌侵襲的な性質‌‌を持つと考えられています。
  • 発見されたインプラントの一部は、セロトニン、ドーパミン、カリウムなどの‌‌神経伝達物質を変化させる可能性‌‌が示唆されており、これによりエイリアンが人間の幸福、悲しみ、うつ病などを制御している可能性が指摘されています。神経薬理学者によれば、これが事実であれば「彼らはあなたを所有している」ことになります。
  • また、データ（情報）の‌‌アップロードまたはダウンロード‌‌に使用されている可能性も考えられています。
  • Sims氏は、蛍光DNAタギング（‌‌Fluorescent DNA tagging‌‌）と呼ばれるプロセスにも関与している可能性があると示唆していますが、これはまだ研究段階にあります。
  • 鼻腔の球体については、「薬物」のような物質を供給するためのもので、クレーターがあることでより大きな量の物質を長期間にわたって供給できる可能性があると説明されています。これは実験の一環であり、完了すると非常に小さいため患者が気づかないうちに排出されるとSims氏は推測しています。

• ‌‌手術とチーム、そして資金‌‌

  • Sims氏はこれまで‌‌25回のインプラント除去手術‌‌を指揮または監督しており、最新のものはインドで行われました。
  • ロジャー・リアー博士はSims氏の指導のもとで研究を始めましたが、足の手術しか行わず、他の手術はSims氏が雇ったMD（医師）が行っていたとSims氏は明かしています。リアー博士は「インプラント医」として振る舞いましたが、それは真実ではなかったとSims氏は述べています。
  • Sims氏は「マスター催眠療法士」「医療催眠療法士」「催眠麻酔療法士」として、手術中に‌‌催眠麻酔‌‌を使用しています。これにより、患者は麻酔を必要とせず、回復が3〜5倍速くなるとされています。彼の催眠麻酔の技術は、脳外科医や心臓血管外科医、麻酔科医を含む医師たちにも感銘を与えています。
  • Sims氏は、彼らの研究は‌‌完全に慈善的‌‌であり、インプラント除去手術や術中の催眠麻酔など、被拉致者から一切費用を受け取っていません。彼は不動産投資家としての収入を研究資金に充てており、家族を破産させることもしばしばあると語っています。ボブ・ビゲロー氏が3回の手術に資金を提供したこともあります。
  • Sims氏は、DNAサンプルの分析には1回あたり14,000ドル以上かかるなど、非常に高額な費用がかかると述べています。彼はエイリアンの存在を示す15のDNA蛍光サンプルを保有していると主張しています。

• ‌‌エイリアンの性質に関するSims氏の見解‌‌

  • Sims氏によれば、遭遇したエイリアンは「全能」でも「全知」でもなく、3D空間では人間と同じくらい脆弱です。彼らは人々が麻痺したり、恐怖に陥ったり、畏敬の念を抱いたりしている状態を好みます。
  • 彼が遭遇したエイリアンの多くは、‌‌IQが80〜85程度の「白痴」レベル‌‌であると評価しています。この知能の低さは、被拉致者がイベント後に服を後ろ前に着たり、靴を間違えたり、家の外で発見されたりするなどの奇妙な出来事と関連付けられています。
  • Sims氏は、これらのエイリアンは自然に生まれた存在ではなく、‌‌「人類との相互作用を目的として作られ、孵化され、クローン化され、または製造されたモデル」‌‌であると考えています。彼は彼らが他の惑星からの知的生命体であるという証拠を一切見つけていません。
  • ただし、より高い知能を持つエイリアン（「医師」タイプと呼ばれる背の高いグレイや、カマキリ型エイリアン、ノルディック型エイリアン）も存在すると述べています。
  • 彼らの「プログラム」は‌‌約6,000年‌‌にわたって行われており、現在‌‌最後の100年‌‌に入っているという情報もあると述べ、最終的には「チェックメイトでゲームオーバー」になると考えています。
  • エイリアンは、人々が彼らを「異世界からのエイリアン」だと信じ込ませようとしており、そのために被拉致者の記憶に‌‌ブロックを設置したり、偽りの記憶（false memory syndrome）を植え付けたりしている‌‌とSims氏は主張しています。例えば、「3フィートのフクロウ」や「巨大な鹿」といった記憶は、エイリアン自身によって作り出されたものだと説明されています。

Derrel Sims氏のインプラント現象に関する見解は、彼の個人的なトラウマと、その後の実地調査、除去手術、科学的分析、そして彼独自のエイリアンに対する哲学が複雑に絡み合って形成されています。彼の研究は、エイリアンの存在を物理的な証拠に基づいて証明し、彼らの行動原理を理解しようとする試みであると言えるでしょう。

彼のインプラントに対するアプローチは、まるで未知のウイルスを特定し、その感染経路と作用機序を解明しようとする‌‌医療探偵‌‌のようです。彼自身が患者であり、同時にその治療者でもあるという点で、その取り組みは非常に個人的かつ専門的です。

記憶のブロックの偽の記憶

AI

Derrel Sims氏のより大きな文脈において、エイリアンによる‌‌記憶のブロック（blocks in the memories）‌‌と‌‌偽の記憶（false memory syndrome）‌‌は、エイリアンが人類との相互作用の真の性質を隠し、彼らの意図を制御するために用いる‌‌主要な戦術‌‌として議論されています。

ソースがこの現象について述べている点は以下の通りです。

• ‌‌記憶のブロックの設置と目的‌‌

  • Sims氏によると、かつてエイリアンは彼らの活動について人々に知られたくないと考えており、何も話さなかったと述べています。
  • しかし、Sims氏のように4歳半の頃から記憶し始める人々が現れると、エイリアンは「猫を袋から出してしまった」状態になったと表現しています。
  • この状況に対応するため、エイリアンは‌‌被拉致者の記憶の中に「ブロック」を設置し始めた‌‌とSims氏は主張しています。これにより、多くの被拉致者はイベントの記憶を失うことになります。このブロックの目的は、エイリアンの存在や彼らが人類に対して行っていることを、人間が認識したり記憶したりするのを防ぐことにあります。

• ‌‌偽の記憶の生成とその具体例‌‌

  • 記憶のブロックと並行して、エイリアンは「これまでに開発された中で‌‌最も精巧で最高の偽の記憶症候群‌‌」を作り出したとSims氏は述べています。
  • この偽の記憶は、被拉致者がエイリアンとの遭遇から戻った際に、‌‌現実とは異なるイメージを記憶させる‌‌ために用いられます。
  • 具体的な例として、「3フィートのフクロウ」や「巨大な鹿」、あるいは「大きな黒い目を持つ何か」だったが鹿やオオカミではない、といった記憶が挙げられています。
  • Sims氏自身も、遭遇したカジノの従業員が、UFO体験の直後に「車ほどの大きさのフクロウがフロントガラスに降りてきた」と語った例を共有しています。Sims氏はこのフクロウの記憶が、エイリアンによって作られた偽の記憶であると考えています。
  • これらの偽の記憶は、エイリアンが直接遭遇した人間が抱く恐怖や困惑を管理し、‌‌イベントの本当の性質を隠蔽する「スクリーン記憶（screen memories）」‌‌として機能しているとSims氏は説明しています。

• ‌‌エイリアンの目的と人類への影響‌‌

  • Sims氏は、エイリアンが私たちに「彼らが他の世界からのエイリアンである」と信じ込ませるために‌‌必死になっている（bent over backwards）‌‌と考えています。これは、彼らの真の性質や起源（例えば、彼らが‌‌自然に生まれた存在ではなく、人類との相互作用のために作られ、孵化され、クローン化され、または製造されたモデル‌‌であるというSims氏の見解）を隠すためです。
  • 記憶のブロックや偽の記憶は、この「プログラム」の一部であり、エイリアンが自分たちの行動や存在を人間社会に浸透させつつも、‌‌その真の目的や能力を秘匿する‌‌ために使われています。
  • 人間はこれらの操作によって、自分自身の経験や記憶すらも信頼できない状態に置かれ、エイリアンの「プログラム」の被験者として、彼らの意図する枠内で行動させられている可能性があります。神経伝達物質を変化させるインプラントの可能性も、エイリアンが人間の感情や精神状態を制御しようとしていることと関連しています。Sims氏にとって、このような記憶操作は、エイリアンが人類を「所有している」ことを意味する、‌‌侵略的かつ欺瞞的な行為‌‌です。

Sims氏の視点では、記憶のブロックと偽の記憶は、エイリアンが人間を‌‌情報の砂漠‌‌に閉じ込める試みと言えるでしょう。そこでは、真実の水源は隠され、旅人（被拉致者）はオアシス（偽の記憶）に導かれ、それが唯一の現実であると信じ込まされてしまうのです。

政府の UFO に関する知識

AI

Derrel Sims氏の軍事・諜報機関での経験という大きな文脈において、情報源は‌‌政府のUFOに関する知識‌‌について、興味深い、かつ多層的な視点を提供しています。Sims氏自身の元軍事警察官およびCIA工作員としての経験は、この議論に独自の信憑性を与えています。

情報源は、政府のUFOに関する知識について以下のように述べています。

• ‌‌政府内における知識の分断と秘密主義‌‌

  • Sims氏がCIAで勤務していた1966年から1968年の間、UFOの話題は「ウォータークーラーでの雑談」として取り上げられることは‌‌全くありませんでした‌‌。
  • Sims氏は、‌‌「政府の誰もがUFOを知っている」という考えは間違いである‌‌と明確に述べています。彼は「彼らは何も知らない。私を信じてほしい。政府は馬鹿だ。彼らは社会保障番号さえ正しく入力できない」とまで言っています。
  • しかし、Sims氏によると、UFOについて‌‌知っているのは「海軍情報局、空軍、中央情報局、NSAなどの内部のカバール（秘密結社のような集団）」‌‌であると明言しています。
  • これらの「知る者たち」は選挙で選ばれた人々ではなく、誰にも何も話す義務がなく、‌‌大統領からも可能な限り情報を隠している‌‌とSims氏は主張します。ラングレー（CIA本部）の正門でUFOについて尋ねても、彼らはあなたのことを頭がおかしいと思うでしょう。
  • Sims氏が遭遇した拉致被害者の少女が個人的にUFO遭遇について彼に相談したことは、公式には知られていないにもかかわらず、個人的な経験は存在することを示唆しています。

• ‌‌政府が保有するUFOに関する決定的な証拠‌‌

  • Sims氏は、国防システムプログラム（DSP）衛星の専門家と出会ったことを語っています。この専門家はトップシークレットの機密情報にアクセスできる人物でした。
  • DSP衛星は赤外線、紫外線、可視光線の3つの「目」を持っており、Sims氏が「空飛ぶ円盤」について尋ねたところ、専門家はその言葉を否定しつつも、‌‌「ファストウォーカー」や「スローウォーカー」と呼ばれる現象は「常に」観測している‌‌と認めました。
  • Sims氏は「空飛ぶ円盤」が「ファストウォーカー」や「スローウォーカー」と同義語であるかを尋ねた際に、「肯定も否定もできない」という返答があったことから、これが肯定を意味すると解釈しました。
  • この専門家は、‌‌米国政府が「UFOとのあらゆる接触事象について、いつ、どこへ行き、どこで停止したか、基本的にあなたの家で、といった全ての事象の決定的な証拠（prima facie evidence）とログ記録」を保有している‌‌と断言しました。これは衛星の設立以来、地球上で起こった全ての「ファストウォーカー」および「スローウォーカー」のイベントの記録を意味します。

• ‌‌情報統制の目的‌‌

  • この情報統制と秘密主義は、エイリアンが自らの存在の真の性質（彼らが自然発生的な存在ではなく、人類との相互作用のために作られ、孵化され、クローン化され、または製造された「モデル」であるというSims氏の考え）を隠すための「プログラム」の一部であるというSims氏の広範な見解と一致しています。
  • 政府内の少数のカバルが情報を独占し、一般の政府職員や国民からは遠ざけることで、UFO現象に関する従来のパラダイム（枠組み）を維持し、社会への影響をコントロールしようとしていると示唆されます。

総じて、Sims氏の経験と彼の情報源は、UFOに関する政府の知識が、‌‌一般公開された情報と、一部のエリート集団が独占し、厳重に秘匿する情報との間で二重の現実を形成している‌‌と強く主張しています。これはまるで、一般市民には図書館の特定のセクションしか見せないようにし、真に重要な情報が収められた「禁断のアーカイブ」へのアクセスは、ごく少数の選ばれし者のみに許されているようなものです。そして、そのアーカイブの存在自体も、徹底的に隠蔽されているのです。

scoop mark と‌「強烈な紫外線」‌の関係

AI

Derrel Sims氏の「医療と研究」というより大きな文脈において、情報源は‌‌スクープマーク‌‌について以下のように述べています。これは、エイリアンとの遭遇の身体的証拠と、その現象を理解・調査するためのSims氏のアプローチを浮き彫りにしています。

• ‌‌スクープマークの定義と外観‌‌

  • スクープマークは、Sims氏自身も持つような‌‌「5/8インチの巨大なスクープマーク」‌‌として説明されています。
  • それは「月のクレーターのように」非常に大きく見えると表現されています。
  • Sims氏は、4歳の時にこの傷を負った際、自身の足が約3インチの厚さしかなかったため、いかにこの傷が大きいかを強調しています。

• ‌‌Sims氏自身の経験と記憶の操作‌‌

  • Sims氏は、自身が4歳で遭遇した際、翌朝にこのスクープマークを発見し、それが‌‌「焼灼された傷（carterized wound）」‌‌であったと述べています。
  • 彼は傷に触れながら「かさぶたはどこにあるのか、どうしてこんなことになったのか」と自問した際、‌‌「記憶のテープ」のような声‌‌が頭の中に聞こえ、「転んで怪我をした」と告げたと語っています。
  • しかし、Sims氏はこの「記憶」が‌‌「100%真実ではない」‌‌と断言しています。これは、エイリアンがイベントの真の性質を隠蔽するために用いる‌‌「スクリーン記憶（screen memories）」‌‌の一例であるとSims氏は示唆しています。彼は、他の事例でも、被拉致者に現実に一致しないイメージが残されることがあると説明しています。

• ‌‌スクープマークの原因と関連するエイリアンの装置‌‌

  • Sims氏の研究では、スクープマークは‌‌「強烈な紫外線」‌‌によって引き起こされ、‌‌「日光弾力線維症（solar elastosis）」‌‌と呼ばれる現象であるとされています。これは傷を急速に焼灼する効果があります。
  • 興味深いことに、医療的な発見がされる前に、ある被拉致者が‌‌「小さな回転する切断部分を持つ鉛筆のような装置」‌‌のスケッチを描きました。この装置は皮膚を切り取り、その後「明るい光で傷を焼灼」するとされています。この証言は、エイリアンが特定の技術を用いてこれらのマークを残していることを示唆しています。

• ‌‌研究と証拠収集における重要性‌‌

  • Sims氏は、カンファレンスで自身のスクープマークを見せて、他の参加者に同様のマークがあるか尋ねるなど、これを身体的証拠として活用しています。
  • 彼のチームは「スクープマークを研究している」と述べており、これがエイリアンによる物理的な接触の証拠として、彼の「エイリアンハンター」としての活動の中心的な部分を占めています。彼は、エイリアン遭遇の真の証拠を見つけるためには、伝統的な科学的アプローチに加えて、訓練された「ネイティブアメリカンインディアンの追跡者」のような洞察力も必要だと考えています。

医療と研究の観点から見ると、スクープマークは単なる身体的な傷以上のものです。それは、‌‌物理的な現実がどのように歪められ、エイリアンの介入によって記憶が操作されるかを示す生きた証拠‌‌であり、Sims氏がエイリアンの存在とその活動の真の性質を解明しようとする彼の飽くなき探求の原動力となっています。

例えるなら、スクープマークは、‌‌犯罪現場に残された指紋のようなもの‌‌です。それは誰がそこにいたのか、何が起こったのかを示す具体的な痕跡ですが、Sims氏の事例では、その指紋が単なる犯人の識別だけでなく、その犯人がいかに巧妙に証拠を改ざんし、証人の記憶を操作しようとしたかまでも示していると言えるでしょう。

閃光を放つ UFO に遭遇 → 直後に巨大なフクロウに遭遇

AI

ご質問ありがとうございます。UFO会議の休憩中にダレル・シムズ氏と話した女性の体験について、詳細に敷衍します。ご指摘の通り、この話を聞いたのはゲストのダレル・シムズ氏ではなく、‌‌ホストのマーティン・ウィリス氏‌‌でした。文字起こしテキストでは文脈から読み取る必要がありますが、この会話の語り手はマーティン・ウィリス氏です。

マーティン・ウィリス氏がフェニックスのUFO会議で聞いた話は以下の通りです。

• ‌‌遭遇の背景と人物‌‌

  • マーティン・ウィリス氏は、フェニックスで開催されたUFO会議の際に、カジノの敷地内を愛犬と散歩していました。
  • その時、休憩中の‌‌カジノの従業員‌‌と出会い、彼女はマーティン氏の犬について話した後、何のために会議が開かれているのか尋ねました。
  • マーティン氏が「UFO会議だ」と答えると、彼女は‌‌「以前にUFOを見たことがある」‌‌と語り始めました。マーティン氏は、UFO分野に全く関わっていない一般の人々の話を聞くことを好んでいます。

• ‌‌UFOとの遭遇‌‌

  • 女性によると、彼女と友人はホピの国（会議の場所からそれほど遠くない場所）を車で運転していました。
  • 突然、あるメサの上から‌‌「大きな暗い物体」‌‌が浮かび上がり、それはまるでメサの頂上から浮き上がったかのように見えました。
  • その物体は彼女たちの車の真上まで来て、その瞬間に‌‌「光の閃光」‌‌が放たれ、‌‌「本当に、本当に明るい光」‌‌が車内に降り注ぎました。
  • 女性と運転していた友人は‌‌パニック‌‌に陥り、友人（運転手）はそのままアクセルを踏み込み、約30マイルも猛スピードで走り続けました。その高速道路は非常に直線的だったとのことです。

• ‌‌奇妙な後続体験と「スクリーン記憶」の関連性‌‌

  • マーティン氏は女性に「失われた時間（missing time）」のような経験があったか尋ねましたが、彼女は何を言っているのか全く分かりませんでした。
  • しかし、女性は「その直後に奇妙なことが一つだけ起こった」と語りました。それは、‌‌「車ほどの大きさのフクロウが、車のフロントガラスに向かって降下してきた」‌‌というものでした。
  • この「車ほどの大きさのフクロウ」という描写は、ダレル・シムズ氏が自身の研究で言及する‌‌「スクリーン記憶（screen memories）」‌‌の概念と興味深い関連性があります。シムズ氏によると、エイリアンは遭遇の真の性質を隠蔽するために、‌‌「3フィートのフクロウ」‌‌や「巨大な鹿」のような、現実とは一致しないイメージを被拉致者の記憶に残すことがあります。カジノの従業員が「失われた時間」について知らなかったにもかかわらず、その出来事の直後に巨大なフクロウを見たという話は、このスクリーン記憶の例として解釈できるかもしれません。

• ‌‌情報の共有‌‌

  • マーティン・ウィリス氏は、この話を聴衆と共有しました。
  • 彼は以前に、フクロウの目撃情報について研究しているマイク・クレロン氏を番組に招いていたため、この女性の情報をマイク・クレロン氏に送ってもよいか尋ね、女性の承諾を得ました。
  • マーティン氏によれば、二人は現在連絡を取り合っており、マイク・クレロン氏もその話に非常に興奮していたそうです。

この女性の体験は、UFO遭遇が物理的な現象だけでなく、記憶の操作や奇妙な心理的影響を伴う可能性を示唆しており、ダレル・シムズ氏が提唱するエイリアンの「プログラム」と「スクリーン記憶」の理論を裏付けるような事例として、UFO研究において貴重な情報源となっています。

例えるなら、この女性の体験は、‌‌複雑なパズルのピース‌‌のようなものです。UFOと光の閃光という直接的な出来事だけでなく、「車ほどの大きさのフクロウ」という一見無関係な、しかし強烈なイメージが、エイリアンの介入という全体像を隠蔽するための‌‌「偽装されたピース」‌‌として挿入されている可能性を示唆しています。

米軍狙撃手の証言：ベトナム戦争中に北ベトナム軍を指揮していた ET を射殺した

AI

フェニックスのUFO会議の休憩中、マーティン・ウィリス氏（ホスト）は、ダレル・シムズ氏が共有した、ベトナムの狙撃手に関する興味深い話について言及しました。この話は、シムズ氏のエイリアンに関する見解、特に彼らが「人間との相互作用のために作られたモデル」であるという理論を裏付けるものとして非常に重要です。

以下は、ベトナムの狙撃手の話の詳細です。

• 話の出どころ：ダレル・シムズ氏がカンファレンスの「ミート・アンド・グリート・ディナー」で語ったものです。ある女性が、エイリアンとの接触について聞いた中で最も興味深い話は何かと尋ねた際に披露されました。その場にはスタン・フリードマン氏も同席しており、シムズ氏の話を聞くために他の会話を中断するほどでした。シムズ氏はこの話は「重要なものの一つ」だと述べています。

• 狙撃手の正体：シムズ氏に連絡を取ったのは、元ベトナム戦争の米軍狙撃手でした。彼はエイリアンやUFOの存在を全く信じておらず、「狂っている」と考えていました。このことが、彼の証言の信憑性を高めているとシムズ氏は考えています。

• 遭遇の状況：

  • 狙撃手は「スポッター」（標的を探す監視役）と共に、北ベトナム将校を標的とする任務中でした。
  • スポッターがまず「信じられないものを見た」と報告し、狙撃手はスターライトスコープを通してそれを目撃しました。
  • スコープ越しに、彼は**「それら（エイリアン）の一つ」が北ベトナム将校と他の部隊との会合の真っただ中にいる**のを見ました。その部隊の兵士たちは皆AK-47で武装していました。
  • シムズ氏が「誰が会議の責任者だったように見えたか」と尋ねると、狙撃手は**「間違いなくあの虫だった」**と答えました。

• 狙撃手の行動：

  • シムズ氏が次に何をしたか尋ねると、狙撃手は「それが私の仕事だ」と答えました。
  • 彼は「他の誰の頭と同じように、それの頭も爆発した」と述べ、狙撃手がそのエイリアンを撃ち殺したことを示唆しました。
  • シムズ氏は、狙撃手が発砲した場所には誰も行こうとしないため、死体は闇の中に「飛び散った」だろうと説明しています。

• シムズ氏の解釈と理論の裏付け：

  • この狙撃手の話は、シムズ氏のエイリアンに関する中心的な理論を強く支持しています。シムズ氏は、これらのエイリアンは**「人間との相互作用のために、作られ、孵化させられ、クローン化され、または製造されたモデル」であると主張しています。彼は、彼らが「他の世界から来た知的生命体であるという証拠を微塵も見つけていない」**と述べています。
  • シムズ氏は、小さなグレイタイプのエイリアンはIQが約80から85（これは「愚鈍な者」のIQに相当すると説明されています）しかないと指摘しています。彼は「3本の指で、親指に対向する指がないのにどうやって宇宙船を造るのか」と問いかけ、「誰かが彼らのためにそれを行っている」と結論付けています。この狙撃手の話は、これらのエイリアンが完全に自律的で全能の存在ではないというシムズ氏の考えと一致しています。
  • この事例は、エイリアンが物理的な形で存在する際に、人間と同じくらい脆弱であるというシムズ氏の見解を強調しています。彼らは、人間が麻痺したり、恐怖に陥ったり、畏敬の念を抱いたりして、反撃できない状態にあることを好むため、今回のケースのように狙撃手が気づかずに反撃したことは、彼らが「ミスを犯した」瞬間だったとシムズ氏は説明しています。

このベトナムの狙撃手の話は、エイリアンが単なる超自然的な存在ではなく、特定の目的のために「作られた」存在であり、物理的な弱点を持つ可能性があるというダレル・シムズ氏のユニークな視点を具体的に示すものです。

例えるなら、この狙撃手の体験は、舞台劇のキャストが観客に気づかれずに「素」の姿を見せてしまった瞬間のようなものです。彼らは異世界の存在という役割を演じているのかもしれませんが、この出来事は、彼らが実は人間世界で行動するために作られた「パペット」や「ロボット」であり、物理的に「撃たれる」という弱点を持つことを暴露したと言えるでしょう。

情報源

動画(2:00:57) ＂Alien Hunter＂, Derrel Sims talks about UFOs, Aliens, Implants & Encounters 03-09-16

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBZZ8bgBciI

動画概要欄

Mar 11, 2016 PodcastUFO Live Show Alejandro Rojas with the UFO News, and “Alien Hunter” Derrel Sims joins us to talk about his encounters, implants and sightings as well as discusses implants, surgeries and more. Hear the whole show and all the archives, by supporting us for as little as $2 per month. Listen on your iPhone or media player. Sign up at podcastufo.com

文字起こし

展開

(transcript 1of2)

（以下は、文字起こしの前半です。Derrel Sims がゲストです。）

Daryl Sims, welcome to the show. How are you doing? Good. Great. Thanks for joining us. I'm hearing a little bit of feedback, unfortunately. Can you turn down the volume of the speakers, please? (0:15:50)

---

I will right now. Yeah, this wasn't doing it when we did a sound check. But anyway, why don't you tell the listening audience again? Welcome to the show. Can you give the listening audience a little bit of your background and what got you interested? It's always an interesting topic when I find out how people first get interested in the UFO topic. Well, as I've told people before, I was kind of a captive audience. (0:16:22)

I was four years old when I saw an entity leaving my room. I sat up in bed. It was late at night. I sat up in bed and I couldn't figure out who was in my room. And this was in Midland, Texas in 1952. And I saw this skinny little guy walking toward the wall. And I thought to myself, who is that? What is that? (0:16:44)

You know, I mean, I didn't know. And the amazing thing is that he apparently heard me thinking that because he turned around immediately. And then I found something rather stunning. I heard him say something without using his mouth. And he said, it's awake. It's awake. Wow. Interesting. Now, had you ever had a UFO sighting as well? I have. I've seen over 50 UFOs my entire life. (0:17:15)

I've done a lot of... I used to live in New Mexico in Alamogordo by Holloman Air Force Base. Good night. I've been a lot of places in about 30 countries around the world. We've got about 1,650 cases worldwide that we work on. And in fact, I just got back from India. We did an implant surgery in India about three months ago. Yeah, we're going to be talking about that a little bit later on. (0:17:41)

That's pretty interesting. Now, you said you had over 50 sightings, which I think is amazing. And I do know some other people, at least one that's probably had that many. And one of the things I have to say about that is you're looking for one. Whereas a lot of people that never have a sighting at all are not looking. I'm constantly looking. And I've talked about my one sighting that I had. (0:18:12)

But I actually, and I'm reluctant to talk about a second sighting, only because I'm worried about my credibility. And so I don't know what I saw. I saw, when I saw lights in the sky, that was the second one I saw, that actually like zigged and zagged. And first it was moving in a steady way. And then it zigged and zagged. And then I said, no, I'm not going to call it a UFO. I don't know what it was. (0:18:39)

I consider lights in the sky, lights in the sky. And I'm just going to try to leave it at that. That's really the safest way to think of it. In some of my cases, the events were witnessed by other people. And in several of those incidents, bright, literally bright sunlight, where three red, orange disks came across the sky, heading toward Holloman Air Force Base and went over it. (0:19:06)

One time, my wife, who was, when she was a kid in Alamogordo, New Mexico, about 16 years old, saw a UFO, metallic, hanging out in the sky out about two miles outside town. (0:19:19)

---

A lot of people saw it, watched it for two or three hours, and she finally got bored and went back inside. Yes, I talked to someone in Russia that saw what sounded like, I've heard people call them a probe or a drone, that this thing, they said it looked just like the size of a washing machine, and it was spinning, and it just sat above the sky. (0:19:44)

And it was four hours. They came out, looked at it, you know, got all the neighbors out to look at it, looked at it with binoculars, the whole thing. But eventually, they all just got bored and went inside. So it's kind of funny. I mean, I don't know if I would. I think I would just watch it until something else happened. Get some popcorn if I had to. (0:20:06)

If I had seen the UFO, I guarantee you, I'd have been watching it a little longer during that circumstance. But she was just finally got bored. She said it just sat there forever, and they couldn't figure out what it was all about. So they just went inside, and that was it. Yeah, on the message board... Not an abductee or anything like that. Ah, on the message board, someone wrote, 16-year-olds have a short attention span, which is very true. (0:20:32)

Today, they'd be glued to their iPhone. And speaking of message board, if you are listening live, you are welcome to jump in. Our message board just takes two clicks to get in there. You can change your profile name, have an image, whatever you want to do. So, Darrell, so this began young with you. Did you have other encounters all your life growing up? (0:20:58)

I did. I had encounters only from the age of about four and a half till age 17, where my events ended very violently. And after that, that was it. I never had another event. Wow. Can you talk about that? Ended violently? The last one was pretty scary. And I've never told anybody about it in any detail for a number of reasons. I've been looking for people that had the same experience. (0:21:28)

And the entities that showed up in my last event, there were five of them. They don't show up in UFO literature at all. So anyway, I always get people calling or they'll tell me, Oh, yeah, me too. Just exactly like it. And that's great. Describe them. Yeah. And what do they do? What are they about? And the whole story. And I've only had eight people be able to answer that. (0:21:52)

And the eight people that I've talked to that did answer that. Normally brought it up to me before I ever even mentioned it. And in that case, every one of these people, without exception, were traumatized in the worst sense of the word. One of them ended up with grand mal epilepsy after her event. Others, one lady, absolutely beautiful woman, thought she was the ugliest thing in the world. (0:22:20)

And I said, you know, I said, you're really stunningly pretty. (0:22:26)

---

And she said, no, I'm not. And when I took her back to her event and using revivification hypnotherapy, her face contorted to the most ugly thing you've ever seen in your life. And that's the way he left her. Anyway, just really... There are things out there that are, I guess, more than in our events. I guess if there was an SS of the alien, it would be something like that. (0:22:58)

It sounds to me like the detective side of you, which we can talk a little bit about later, likes to leave known evidence quiet to hear, you know, stay away from the copycat type situation where you're just waiting to actually hear something to confirm what you had happen. Is that what I'm getting? You are getting it perfectly. That's exactly correct. Yeah. And wow, that's really amazing. (0:23:30)

And so since 17 on, you're saying you had 50 sightings or so, or more, pardon me. And can you get into describing why do you think you're seeing so many? Well, some of the sightings I could attribute to a possibly unique craft out at White Sands Missile Range Area and Holloman Air Force Base. Oh, yeah. I saw a large triangular type object in the early 80s going across the sky, blocking out stars. (0:24:09)

And it was probably the size of a triangular postage stamp, if there was one, at an arm's distance. So it was pretty large. And it had an orange trail of spent fuel, I guess, behind it. And that was the only thing that lit it up from behind. And I could tell the shape of it because the stars it was blocking out. But the most interesting thing to me, what just floored me, was it never made a sound. (0:24:41)

Yes. I have to tell you, that's for my own personal sighting, the one I often talk about, that got me really interested in the subject. That was absolutely the number one thing that shocked me, is I just couldn't believe this thing was moving without making any sound, and how it could be stationary and then move again, and nothing. And that really is, it doesn't fit our paradigm, and it just doesn't fit our normal reality. (0:25:12)

So it's really hard to take. Well, you're so right. One time we were at our home outside Alamogordo, and my mother called me and she said, come look at this, there's a strange light out here. And up near the mountain, which is in front of our home, out in the edge of the desert, to the mountains, there was a cigar shaped craft, similar to the, and I hate to use this term, the old cigar type craft that some of these wackos used to report all the time, fake photographs of. (0:25:50)

And there it was, and cars were stopped out on the highway. We could see them at the highway, completely stopped, lined up, watching this thing. It was just sitting up there, and it would move around a little bit, stop and go back and forth. (0:26:03)

---

And it was definitely not a helicopter, never made a sound. And there probably were 30, 40 witnesses that night to that entire event. Yeah, wow. Yeah, you know, it's funny, you mentioned earlier this triangular craft. You didn't hear too much of that. I know Dave Marler did a really good book about that and talks about how many of the triangular sightings there were, but I had never heard of anyone talking about triangles back in the 1980s. But I'm sure they happened, yours happened. (0:26:36)

And then I know they do go all the way back to the 1800s. But the cigar shape is one you hear of. And I remember hearing a ufologist from somewhere in Massachusetts told me that he thought that cigar-shaped ones were just simply discs on their side. But I disagree with that after talking to a number of people. One mentioned that he even saw portholes, pardon me, on one. (0:27:09)

You know, I mean, pretty interesting. You are absolutely correct. And these objects, whenever they start flying around and moving, you can see that they're not discs at all. Now, there may be some case that one of them looked like a disc or something. But this particular one we were looking at was definitely a cigar-shaped craft, apparently quite large. And it was fairly well lit. (0:27:32)

And it just stunned everyone. We were not prepared for that at all. Right, right. And what happens when you have 40 witnesses? Did you talk among each other or did everyone just get back in their cars and drive away? We were about a half a mile from the highway. We could see the cars all lined up out there while we were watching this thing. (0:27:56)

As we were watching it for 15, 20 minutes, the cars just were driving from El Paso going into Alamogordo. And some of them would look up and they'd pull over. And then after a while, someone else would pull over. And everybody's pointing up there. And then all of them started looking up there. And there they are. But we never did go talk to them or anything. (0:28:15)

I was just a kid. I mean, just probably 16 and a half, maybe 17 years old, maybe. How about that? Now, when I was reading through the different things that you have done, you call yourself the alien hunter. Can you explain why you call yourself that? I certainly can. Actually, the name came from a journalist who was interviewing me in Atlanta, Georgia. And during the course of the interview, she says, Oh, my God, you're... why you hunt them? (0:28:51)

You're the alien hunter. And it's stuck. I didn't make that up. That's where it came from. And so what were you actually telling her? Let's hear the story. Basically, I hunt them that hunted me and later came and hunted my son. Uh, if you can do anything you want to to me and I'm a big guy, I can take it. (0:29:18)

---

I can live with it. I'll deal with it. But when you come after my children, I will come after you. So now the bottom line is, as my eight words is right now, you came for me. I'm coming for you. And I intend to capture one of them eventually. We come close to it three times already. The good news is we have some DNA samples from some of these entities, and we're excited about the physical evidence that we're getting. (0:29:47)

All right, well, let's talk about that. But before we talk about the the DNA or whatever, let's let's hear when you said you have almost caught them three times. Can you go into detail about that, please? Sure. The I guess the one that probably would be more interesting to you. A gentleman wrote us. He actually asked a question one time on a on a website. (0:30:20)

And he says, you know, he said, you know, I was just wondering if there's an alien buster. And I didn't like the way he said it. So I thought, well, I'll just respond to that. And I sent him a story, which I'm glad to send any of your listeners tonight. It's free. And it's a it's a case in which I took. It happened in the Snowmass Wilderness near Gunnison, Colorado in 1995. I took seven investigators with me and trained them in a particular set of techniques. (0:30:54)

I was using one of my investigators who gets abducted there every year on vacation. We were using him as bait. And that's the truth of it. Wow. And since he's going to and he took someone with him the year before and they witnessed him being abducted. In fact, the witness was a tight end at Texas Tech. And who he did not know was also an abductee himself. (0:31:18)

So I thought that was rather curious. But the bottom line is that we went to this area. And I had a trained observer set up every night outside the man's tent. We had our tents strategically placed in different locations next to a cliff behind us so that they would have to come down into the area or right. Well, I left a path where they could come in the dark in which they did on the on the last night. (0:31:46)

And as the every morning we would question, I would question everybody and say, does anybody notice anything go to each person? And they all said same thing. No, not at all. Nothing at all. Nothing. And the last night on the after and I don't do well at really high distances like that. So I had I got very little sleep in seven days. I mean, I slept in just little 20, 30 minute patches. (0:32:16)

But anyway, the I asked the next that last morning. And could I knew what had happened with me? So I didn't say a thing to anybody. I asked Ronnie and Patrice and anything you hear or notice anything. (0:32:31)

---

And they both said the following. They looked at each other really strange and says, we heard something outside our tent. And something walking. And she looks at him and says, do you hear that? He looks at her and says, it's it's just a deer. Go back to sleep. And they both fell over in deep sleep. Then the entity came outside my tent. It's difficult to explain this to everybody because you have to know the lay of the land. (0:33:03)

There was a bright light in the middle of the campground area, right? Especially right next to my that worked right next to Dale's tent. Where the trained observer was sitting, who happened to be a commercial airline pilot with a major airline. He's a captain on an airline. And he sat there every night. I mean, until it was daylight every night and never, of course, never saw a thing. (0:33:27)

And so on and so on. But that night they came from behind, which I thought that they would. And they came behind our tents. And one of them came outside my tent and I could see him. Because of the light in the middle area, it was shining apparently on the back of him and against my tent. So I could see him clearly. Like a silhouette or something? (0:33:49)

He had a large head that was... I've never seen one like this before. His head was approximately a third the size of him. And he was only about three, maybe three and a half feet tall. Maybe. I've never seen one like that ever. And what I did remember, though, about my events was the way they communicated mentally. And I thought, you know, this is a great opportunity for me to figure out something, see if anything works or not, since I'm conscious and not abducted. (0:34:20)

And so I got my face over close to the edge of the tent to see if I could communicate with this thing, see if it was possible. And sure enough, I was. And I was absolutely stunned at the... and this may offend some of our listeners... at the lack of his intelligence. These little guys have an IQ of about 80 to 85. That's about the IQ of a moron. (0:34:50)

And as a result, whenever they bring you back from some of these events, people find out that they get their clothes on backwards. They get your wrong shoes on the wrong feet. They may put you in the wrong bed. Or if you're on the couch, you may end up in the bed. In some cases, people end up outside their house, even though they had a double tumbler lock. (0:35:13)

What that means is you have to have keys to get in and keys to get out. And the keys were inside the house. In one case, we had... my senior investigator got abducted with his friend, again, on one of these trips. And they picked him up, truck and all, in Fort Collins on the road. (0:35:32)

---

And they dropped him off in Dalhart, Texas, truck and all, with the wrong guy driving the truck. Wow. Now, you just mentioned the IQ. And of course, you know, the first thought that comes to mind, well, if that's so, then how did they travel the stars? And how did they get here? And how do they communicate non-verbally? And blah, blah, blah. But I can also hear a possible reply that this is a sort of a drone that's... or something like that, that's working. (0:36:07)

What is your take on why something like that could be here and have not a high intelligence? Well, let me back up to my last event, my first event at age four, four and a half, whatever my age was then, little tiny guy. And say this, whenever the entity heard me and turned around, as all little kids would do, if you walk into the room nude, they're going to look at whatever's nude. (0:36:35)

And I noticed that he didn't have a TT. He didn't have a belly button. And he didn't have mammary glands of any kind. And I was sitting there, stunned in my little bed, wondering, where's the rest of this guy? I mean, what, what is this? How come he was not like us? I couldn't understand that. And after investigating for nearly 40 years now, I realized if you don't have genitalia, you don't procreate. (0:37:04)

If you don't have a navel or belly button, so to speak, you weren't born. So you were either hatched, cloned, manufactured or made. And in my opinion, the seven primary entities we're looking at, the so-called little gray, the taller gray, that's often called the doctor or the boss, the reptile, the praying mantis, and the so-called bigfoot, these particular entities, in my opinion, based on, and this is based on a lot of research and not, not something I dreamed up or wanted to come up with. (0:37:43)

This is just, this is the answer at this point. This is what my thinking is at this point. These are models made, hatched, cloned or manufactured for the purpose of interaction with mankind. Now, was this a question, we have a number of questions up on the message board. Was this entity in particular wearing any type of suit or anything? Did you actually see him out from the tent? (0:38:07)

The entity that I saw outside the tent did not have, appear to have any clothing on because I'm looking at him through the, he's a shadow on the side of my tent. He's standing right next to the tent, to the edge of the tent. And he did not have any, it did not appear to have any clothing on whatsoever. Many of them do not. (0:38:28)

The ones that do have clothing on, in most cases, this appears to be some type of rank or position among them. How about that? Now, again, I mentioned earlier that we have a message board and people are in there now asking questions. (0:38:43)

---

Matthew wants to know, how did the discovery of alien fluorescence come to be? Oh, great question. Well, you got some great, great people in there. Fluorescence was found by me in 1992. In 1992, I was working with this lady that I mentioned to you that was, that thought she was really ugly, but that's quite beautiful. And while I was interviewing her, I said, may I examine your exposed face, arms and so on? (0:39:16)

She said, of course. And I pulled out a blacklight and started checking her exposed arms and face and neck. And on the inside of her arm, as I lifted it up, there was a Mandelbrot set. The Mandelbrot set, for those that may not know about that, it's a mathematical construct. It kind of looks like a heart. And it was bright blue. And its meaning has a description mathematically of order and chaos. (0:39:47)

And that was on the inside of her arm. And when she saw that, and when I saw it, me and the other investigator were just sitting there scratching our heads like, can you believe this? And as we looked at it, she went to the bathroom and started scrubbing it. She reminded me of a rape victim. Now they will wash themselves and washing, trying to get whatever off of them. (0:40:09)

And the more she scrubbed, of course, the brighter it got because it won't come off. The fluorescence will penetrate your skin on contact if it's the real stuff. The real stuff being something like a sweat-like material that the alien exudes when he touches you. In other words, if he physically takes you in an event, grabs your hand or you grab his hand or arm or whatever, it's likely that you're going to find fluorescence on you in the shape of three long fingers or something like that. (0:40:40)

And that's what we call casual contact. We find other marks in fluorescence on people in rare cases that are procedural markings. And those have to do with they actually put something on you on purpose. Wow. And you mentioned in your bio, I saw that you were one of the... it says that you had some groundbreaking discoveries in as far as implants go. That is true. (0:41:14)

We've got some pretty startling things that we're finding about the implants. And we're doing some pretty private stuff right now because we've got some testing that we're wanting to do and several people that we're doing it with. One of the things that we, of course, how I found implants originally was in 1960. And how I discovered that wasn't because of any brilliance or anything like that. (0:41:41)

It had to do with the fact that I was 12 years old and strangely heard my mother's voice saying to go outside and look at the new star in the pentine. The pentine is a nonsensical thing, but it was amazing that I knew what it was. It was a star system. (0:41:59)

---

In my thinking, and it was just amazing. My mother and dad were on the other end of the house, and there's no way I could hear her perfectly, just like we're talking right here. And I set up instantly in bed, completely wide awake, walked outside, saw a very bright light on the horizon. And obviously, and of course, there was Mars and Venus and everything else out there. (0:42:24)

And you could see the stars and these planets very well. And this very bright light on the horizon. And I kept looking at it thinking, why is it getting bigger? It never occurred to me it's coming toward me. And at 12 years old, you just kind of look at the light. And it was kind of like the movie Phenomenon. A guy kept looking at it and boom, all of a sudden, next thing I know, I'm inside a circular room lying under on a, I call it the slab. (0:42:54)

It's a cold table that is, was elevated about 11 degrees. And I could, I saw my captor over there who always picks me up. Now you can recognize if there's a million of them, even though they look the same, you will easily identify yours. I have no idea because they all look the same to me. I mean, every one of them. But I knew he was there. (0:43:17)

I saw him and I could also see somebody bigger than him that seemed to be in charge. It was quite nasty little guy. And he was in charge of the whole operation. And he had a long, about an eight inch needle-like device with a little silver sphere on the end of it. And he started coming toward me and inserted it in my nasal passage and rammed it up my nasal passage and broke the bones. (0:43:41)

And there was no anesthesia. There was no, you won't feel pain or whatever. It just, it was horrific. And when he finally pulled it back, the needle back out, there was no sphere on the end of it. So that was my first experience with the implant phenomenon. Wow. That's quite a story. Someone wants to know if you know how to stop an abduction? (0:44:06)

Well, I can give you some good hints and I'm glad to do that because as far as I'm concerned, it's invasive. And if you don't want it, I'm happy to help anyone do that. And we have thwarted several abductions in our events. We also did some training for certain abductees who wanted to be our test pilots, so to speak, in their abductions. And I will do it. (0:44:39)

And so we found that the aliens are not all powerful. They're not all everything some people label them to be. They're not all wise. They're not all anything. In fact, when they're in 3D and they're near you, they're just as vulnerable as you are. And that's the reason they prefer you paralyzed and frightened or in awe so that you won't do anything or can't respond or defend yourself in any way. (0:45:04)

But one of the ways that you can do to help yourself just as an average individual is to... I'll give you the kid version of it first. (0:45:21)

---

Sometimes we have children that parents come to me and they're just beside themselves and sometimes in tears saying, my kid keeps telling me about these abductions and how they keep taking them and I don't know what to do. And I said, actually, it's often true that when people grow up after their events or during as they get older, they get where they dislike or can't stand one of their parents because they think they never protected them. (0:45:52)

And this is what one of these parents said. They said, well, we're worried about our kid and we don't know what to do. I mean, just a small kid. What can I do? And I said, this is going to be very simplistic and almost amusing, really. I said, but you'll find that it's very effective against the small gray. And she says, please tell me what it is. (0:46:20)

And I said, have your kid. I said, if they've never seen the Mickey Mouse show, the old version, have them watch it just to learn the song. It doesn't matter what song you use, but that one's kind of fun because it's nonsensical. It goes on forever and ever and ever. And she says, OK, how do you do it? And I said, you just have them sing or any song. (0:46:41)

It doesn't matter. M-I-C-K-E-Y-M-O-U-S-E. And you sing it. And every time they try to focus on you and get you to unfear or awe or whatever their program is, they're going to try to run on you. Don't ever let up. Just keep doing it. Keep singing it until you next thing you know, you're in your room and you're still singing. Your parents may come in and wonder, what are you singing in your room for? (0:47:06)

Because you never made it out or they just they finally just give up on you because you drive them nuts. They're not that smart anyway. You can imagine listening to somebody singing that over and over and over. You can't get through to them. You can't control them at that point. So that's a useful technique I love to use for small children. And when I was filming with my other three co-stars in Uncovering Aliens, the TV show that we started for a series. (0:47:37)

In that one, a little a young girl about 16 had a baseball bat, a little baseball bat she kept beside her bed. And I said, young lady, you're going to need a bigger bat. And what I really meant was you need something better than that because it's highly unlikely you're going to be able to use something like that unless you know what you're doing. (0:47:56)

But using nonsensical terms and focusing yourself in such a way that they cannot access your brain. That is a huge thing to know about the alien. How about that? Someone wrote up on the message board. They should sing. It's a small world after all. And actually, I was thinking that myself. (0:48:20)

---

Crazy. Oh, that's wonderful. It doesn't matter. Someone wants to know if that show is ever coming back on. It's supposed to be on. Look on my Facebook page. Alien Hunter, Daryl Sims. Daryl Sims, the Alien Hunter on Facebook. And I believe somebody's posted. Mike Barra, I think he's one of their co-stars, posted that they're replaying it again, I think this weekend or something. (0:48:44)

But it just got posted up here. So look for Uncovering Aliens on the Facebook. Search for it. Or Mike Barra, my co-star, and he's the one that brought it up. And it's about the Sedona. One of the shows for sure is going to be about the Sedona show that we shot last there. Now, in your bio, it says you were a former military police, a police officer, and also a CIA operative. (0:49:17)

And can you talk a little bit about that background? And when you were actually working with the CIA, did any of this subject ever come up? Like water cooler talk or anything like that? Okay, first part of the question is I was going to New Mexico State University as a college student. I was a year and a half into college and I wanted education to be different for me than what I was getting there. (0:49:45)

That was pretty dry, cut and dried. It was to me like a mass information for mass delivery system for dead information, as far as I was concerned. I mean, I understood the educational value of some of that and getting a degree and all that, but I wanted something more. Education to me meant more than just memorizing data and so on. So I quit college and joined the Vietnam War effort and volunteered for the Army and went in and while I was at Fort Gordon, Georgia, which is the military police school where what I'd signed up for, I and about 70 other people were called out to go to this meeting and long and short of it was the people that were interviewing us were CIA. Of course, we had no idea who they were and I thought they were CID. That's Criminal Investigation Division, which are the detectives of the military police because they they're the only people in the military that we had that wandered around in suits and these guys were in suits. (0:50:50)

And I thought, well, I told him, I said, you guys are CID. And they said, no, but I almost got it right. It was CIA and they didn't tell us who they were or anything. And they kept interviewing us. And finally, they whittled us down to about 25, 30 people. And the head guy interviewed me and said, you're exactly what we want. And I said, you don't know anything about me. (0:51:11)

I know everything about you. Everything. And the long and the short of that was that they'd already done backgrounds and the people they really wanted. And when we finished our schooling there, everybody, of course, got their orders to go somewhere. (0:51:29)

---

And everybody in my entire battalion, with the exception of us, were chosen for this program and volunteered for it because you actually volunteered. And we didn't know what it was, but it sounded pretty interesting. So we ended up going to Washington, D.C. And then after our top secret clearances finally came through, we were hauled off to a secret CIA base. And that's where we began our work. (0:51:54)

My job primarily there was top secret security on the CIA installation and basically a place where they trained spies. And my second thing that I did there that I really enjoyed was a martial arts instructor. And I was also a weapons instructor as well in my short tenure there. So I stayed there for two years. And for those of you out there in radio land that think I'm some kind of CIA agent or something like that, that's not even close. (0:52:28)

I had a disagreement with one of the personnel in the CIA, and they ordered me to violate my First Amendment right. And I refused. And I ended up exiled out of the continental United States to Ascom, Korea and placed back into the military. So I said, my rights are far more important than my duty here or anything else. And I will not surrender that. (0:52:58)

So for those who think I'm on the CIA roll and getting a big check every month, I'd love to have the check, but just ain't happening. And as the man referred to me as I left, he said, you're no longer family. And believe me, that's a serious statement whenever the company makes that kind of statement about you. Were you ever told what they thought was special about you, why the CIA wanted you? (0:53:25)

Well, that's what I asked the guy. I said, you know, I said, you know, I said, I'm a martial arts guy. I said, you know, I had a martial arts school at New Mexico State University, started the first martial arts school there in 1966. And I taught air commandos and black beret in the ROTC program for Army and Air Force. And he said, I know all about that. (0:53:49)

And why me? I don't get it. I said, you know, I would be more interested in the martial arts than probably what you want me to do. And he says, I have two gymnasiums for you. You can have a color TV in your room if you like. You'll never go to Vietnam. And I said, I don't think you understand me, sir. I signed up to go to Vietnam. That was the point. (0:54:10)

And that really puzzled him. And he begged me to explain that. And I said, well, I said, I'm Native American Indian Irish. I said both sides of my family have been busting heads and taking names since at least a thousand years ago. And I said, I don't like the war. I don't like anything about it. (0:54:29)

---

I said, but I would prefer me to go to Vietnam. I said, if I go there, I said, I'm not going to go there to die for my country. I promise you. I'm going there to make you die for your country. I said, and I would prefer me to come back. If, and I think I would. I said, a lot of these boys are going to come back or not going to be the same. (0:54:51)

They're going to be, it's going to ruin a lot of mentally. They have no business being there. They're not real soldiers. They're just draftees. And they have no business being there, in my opinion. It ought to be a volunteer army, not a... Anyway, it was just a difference of opinion with me, but that he was just stunned. And as I said, if you, as you have a son, he said, yes, I do. (0:55:11)

I said, would you like for him to go to Vietnam? He said, no. I said, then I'm taking someone's son's place, aren't I? Wow. He just couldn't grasp that. Now, someone wanted to know what base you served at in Vietnam. I didn't go to Vietnam. I went to Ascom, Korea. Oh, sorry. Sorry. Ascom. Ascom. And I, I served from there almost to the DMZ and Yongsan. I mean, but mostly at Ascom, Korea for nine months. (0:55:40)

Ah, I see. Okay. Um, there was another question I was trying to get to, but they're scrolling in pretty fast. All right. So, um, the question I was thinking about asking you in this, when you were actually working with the CIA, did you ever talk to anyone, um, about your experiences? I had some people talk to me about theirs and interestingly enough, the people I had civilians as well, that were taking martial arts classes from me as well. (0:56:10)

And, um, a young girl came to me and her father was the director of admissions of a very famous university. And he was a martial arts student of mine as well. And his two daughters. And she came to me privately and said, I need to talk to you. And she says, I don't know who else to talk to. And I said, well, talk to me. (0:56:31)

And, uh, what she told me, uh, floored me. This is 1968. She said, Mr. Sims, Sensei is what she called me. It means honorable teacher in Japanese. She said Sensei. And she broke down and started crying. She says this, this strange purple light came into my room, shimmering and everything. Of course, she didn't realize that that is an entity in transit. And at the time I didn't know that either. (0:57:02)

I tried to console her with some stupid statements like, oh, it was just a bad dream or it'll go away. When you're talking to an abductee, that's one of the worst things you could ever, ever say to them. It's not a bad dream. (0:57:15)

---

It's a nightmare, but not a bad dream. It's a real event. And I said, uh, well, I said it's over now and that's okay. And she looked at me and just cried even more. And she said, it came back. And I said, I'm going to tell you something, young lady. I said, if it ever comes back again, you call me 24 seven, anytime, any, I don't care. (0:57:33)

I gave her my private number on the base. I said, you call me and I will come out there immediately. And, uh, and I'll bring out one of my people and we'll, I'll, I'll come there to your home. And, uh, I said, your, I know your dad very well. He'll, he'll welcome us in an instant. So, uh, that was my first introduction to an abductee in, in the, um, in the CIA, uh, the idea that, uh, some people have an idea that everybody in the government knows UFOs. They don't know anything. (0:58:08)

Trust me on this. The government, it's a dumb, those folks can't even, they can't get your social security numbers right. They can't do a lot of things. And I'm not picking on anybody. I'm telling you the gospel truth. The fact is that a cabal inside the office of Naval Investigations and Air Force and Central Intelligence Agency, NSA, and so on, these are the ones who know, but if you walk up to the front door and there's no front door there for you to walk up to, if you walk up to the front gate at Langley and, uh, tell them, I'm here to ask questions about UFOs, they'll just turn you right back around and think you're nuts. (0:58:44)

You know why? Because they think you are. They don't have a clue what you're talking about. Not even a clue. So, uh, the idea that the government knows all of it and we don't know anything. It's just not, that's just not true. Um, the only a portion of the government knows that and they're never going to tell you they're not elected people and they don't have to tell anybody anything and they hide it even from presidents as much as they can. (0:59:07)

Wow. Wow. Um, we have a number of questions. Uh, um, it said, did you say that you lectured to 250 surgeons or did someone get that somewhere on your bio or something? I did. I was, um, I, when I was having this interview with this lady that called me the alien hunter, I got a phone call that night after the conference. And, uh, and the gentleman called, it was an MD, a doctor friend of mine. (0:59:37)

He says, Hey, Daryl. And I said, well, hi doc. He said, how'd you like to come speak to a bunch of doctors? And I said, about what? And he said about UFOs, of course, whatever you want. And I said, oh my. And I said, how many? He said about 250. John Muir Medical Hospital. And I said, okay, deal done. (0:59:55)

---

And he said, this is a paid position. It's an AMA sponsored program on continuing education for these doctors. What would you like this subject to be? And I said, medical complications of alleged human alien contact, colon implants. And that was the first presentation. Even John Mack admitted, he said, I've never, he said, I'm an MD. He was a psychiatrist, of course. He said, I never lectured to doctors like that. (1:00:25)

And I said, it was a paid position. They paid me $300 for the presentation, for an hour presentation. And three doctors were so impressed with it, they came on board to help us. Oh, really? Wow, isn't that something? It was amazing. Wow. I still have the video of that. Some people filmed it for me. The doctor was just, he loved every minute of it. (1:00:46)

He said, I just think this is great. I said, they're probably going to hate you for this, but they didn't. Ah, wow. Pardon me. Um, hang on just a minute. I'm going to be putting you on a hold just for a second. I've been trying to figure out my phone and have trouble, but I'll be right back to you in just one minute. (1:01:05)

Okay. So hang in there, Daryl. I'll be right back. Hello, caller. Hello, um, is this the UFO show? Alejandro, how are you? How are you? Thanks for calling in. I hope you don't mind. I wanted to, to remind people about something or let them know for the first time. Cause they might not even know. All right, go ahead. Okay. Yeah. So tomorrow night, there's a special screening of the Phoenix incident movie. (1:01:39)

So that was the movie that was showed at the conference. I don't think you got to it. You were a busy guy. No. But, um, yeah. So tomorrow night, uh, they can check bathroom events.com or the Phoenix incident, uh, website. And what's cool is they're going to show the movie. And this is at theaters all across the country. And after their movie, they're going to show 45 minute round table with myself, uh, Nick Pope, Stanton Friedman, Lee Spiegel, and the movie maker, Keith Arum, where we kind of talk about the fact and the fiction about the Phoenix lights. (1:02:12)

And what's going to be fun is people are going to watch this movie. And I think they're going to be freaked out to know that, you know, a lot of what's in the movie, although it's fiction, but a lot of it is like real, like, you know, the alleged stock fights with UFOs and stuff like that. All right. Excellent. Well, hey, do you have anything to say to Daryl? (1:02:28)

Now, Daryl, I'm having trouble. Daryl, how's it going? I'm having trouble with my phone system and I can only take a call and put him on hold. So he's waiting. So I'll just tell him you said hi. Okay. Well, Daryl's a great guy. (1:02:42)

---

I love him. Have fun. All right. All right, Alejandro. Have a great cruise. Okay. Thanks, man. Talk to you later. Talk to you later. Daryl, can you hear me? I can hear you fine. Yeah. Okay. Sorry about that. I have ever since I was on live radio on another program and I was able to take calls. And ever since I went live on my own, I've never been able to take calls. (1:03:09)

And I've been looking at phone systems. So anyway, it was a caller. It was actually Alejandro. He was calling to remind people that they can see the Phoenix Lights movie that's coming out tomorrow. And he also said to say hi. Awesome. I love that guy. Isn't he great? I just loved listening to you two banter back and forth and talk about the satellite stuff. (1:03:32)

We have time, I'll mention something about that too. But I just think he's a great guy. Great guy. He is. And go ahead if you want to mention something about the satellite. You know something about that? Well, I do. One of our people is a DSP satellite specialist. DSP means Defense Systems Programs. And when I first met him, there were 18 geosynchronous satellites traveling around the Earth. And these are the satellites on the program called Enemy of the State. In other words, if you hold your watch real steady and the satellite goes over, it can actually read your watch. (1:04:07)

Now, the interesting thing is that is not classified. It's the stuff you didn't hear that is classified. And anyway, long story short, I was speaking at a conference years ago in LA. And I met this guy. He walked out, real big guy. And he walks out and says, can I speak to you, sir? And I said, of course. He said, I understand how you look for evidence in the visible light. (1:04:33)

You look for bumps, lumps, cuts, scrapes, scars and cuts on these people. I get that. But he said, you were talking about looking at things in infrared and in the ultraviolet range. Why would you do that? Why would you look in the invisible range? And I said, fasten your seatbelt. He said, OK. I said, the alien sees an infrared, ultraviolet, visible light and X-ray all at the same time. (1:05:00)

You know, I wouldn't doubt that. As the human eye sees so little of the spectrum, I forget what the percentage is. But when I read it somewhere, I'm thinking, my God, we just see so little. No wonder when you're using different night vision or anything like that, people seem to see more. Now, there's this guy named Dr. Santilli. He's Italian. I've actually spoken with him. (1:05:33)

He's invented a convex or let me see. I'm sorry, a concave lens and a telescope and claims that he can see, you know, entities and things and yes, really interesting. And he's taking a lot of hits from the science community. (1:05:51)

---

But he's he's got a foundation and he's been I guess he has a lot of funding and he's been working quite hard on this for quite some time. And he's a he's a respected scientist. But again, he's he's anytime anyone rocks the boat of, you know, the paradigm that's current, it's they're looking for trouble, really. Yeah, they'll they'll railroad him out of there. (1:06:15)

(transcript 2of2)

（以下は、文字起こしの後半です。）

I'm familiar with that. But the DSP thing that the reason he mentioned this to me is he mentioned he had a top trigger clearance. And I said, so do I. And he said, would you like to come over dinner at my home tonight? I'd like to talk to you. And I said, OK. And he looked at me and said, you realize the DSP satellite has the same three eyes that you use infrared, the ultraviolet, invisible light. (1:06:40)

I said, is the DSP satellite ever seen a flying saucer? He said, there are no such thing as flying saucers. Don't ever use those words around me. I said, OK. I said, if I use the word fast walker or slow walker, he said, now we see those all the time. I said, if I use the word flying saucer, would it be synonymous with fast walker and slow walker to you? (1:07:06)

And he said, I can neither confirm nor deny that, which means yes, of course. But the fact is, he said, I said, are you trying to tell me that the DSP satellite systems has a log and a record of every ascension declination of every event that's happened with fast and slow walkers on this planet since their inception? He smiled and said, absolutely. I said, you're telling me, in effect, the United States government has prima facie evidence of every contact event with a UFO, where it went, where it stopped, basically at your house, so to speak. (1:07:40)

And they know. And he said, that would be correct. Wow. Wow. We have some questions up here. And one of them is, do you know if anyone else like taking the reins of Dr. Roger Lear and actually doing surgeries? You said something about one in India. Yeah. Well, I'd like to maybe correct the record a little bit. Roger started under me. I see. (1:08:10)

Now, he was a podiatrist, right? He was a foot doctor. So he only did one surgery on the foot and the rest of them, he did not do at all. He claimed to do that and he didn't. We always hired an MD to do these. I see. And he would position himself with his gloves and everything like he was doing something. I hate to say this is awful, but he did that to make everybody think he was the implant doctor. The fact is, it's just not true. (1:08:38)

I see. I've actually spoken to him when he was alive. Seemed like a wonderful gentleman, but we don't really need to focus on that. (1:08:50)

---

But I do want to know what someone wanted to ask. First of all, do you still have that implant that you may have had that sphere that went up in your nasal cavity? And if so, did you ever get an x-ray or anything? No, they came back and got the sphere later, is the best of my information. However, I have a lady that came to the first Native American Indian abduction conference we ever had in Wagner, South Dakota. And she attended my workshop on how to find evidence. (1:09:26)

And a few weeks later, she called me and said, oh, Mr. Sims, my little girl kept saying, there's a mommy, mommy, there's a strange bug-eyed little man that put some things in my nose. And she said, what do I do? And I said, have her sneeze in a Kleenex. Like I showed you. And she did. She found four little gold spheres about the size of a pinhead. (1:09:48)

And she lost the first four. They fell out of her hand. They were so small, she never recovered them in the carpet. And I said, you get down there and cut that carpet out and send it to me. And she said, I vacuumed it at least a dozen times already. And I said, you're just like every other abductee I know out there. Most of you destroy your own evidence or simply ignore it. (1:10:10)

It's part of your programming. A few weeks later, the little girl claimed the same thing, that they had come back and done something in her nose again. The mother had her sneeze in the Kleenex, found four more of them and put them in a baggie and sent them to me. I did have them looked at under the care of Dr. Nick Bilakis at York University. And Nick, I told him I didn't want an assistant. (1:10:36)

I said, I want a full professor looking at this stuff. And I said, I'm not predisposed to it has to be quote unquote alien. I just want to know what it is. And the professor I talked to says, well, I can tell you right now. He said, if I could replicate it, I guarantee it's not alien. I said, I don't care what it is or isn't. I just want to know what it is. (1:10:56)

And after doing his testing for some time, he called me back privately and said, I can't replicate this thing. It looks like a little tiny moon with with craters all over it. I said, it does. And he said, it's about the size of a pinhead. And I said, that is correct. And he got real, real amazing for this professor to say the things he did. (1:11:19)

He said, what do you think they did with this? Why would they put it in her nose? And I said, are you sure you want to hear this stuff? He said, I do. And I said, well, I'm going to use the term medication as an illustration. (1:11:34)

---

I said, but the fact is medication is not a correct word, but it's a term that we can use to kind of describe it, so to speak. And he says, agreed. And I said, so they put some kind of a medication or whatever it is in this little tiny planet like implant. And it's in the nasal passage. I said, with the little craters in there, you're going to have deeper depths of this substance than in other locations. (1:12:10)

So she's going to get a bigger dose of it. Sometimes it's going to last over a period of time. He said, that makes sense. And I said, in my opinion, that may be what it is. I said, the objects are so small that when that part of the experiment is over, she would sneeze them out and not even know. They're so small, unless you're looking for them, you would never, ever even see them or feel them. (1:12:33)

So we did have that study. And I said, what did you find out? And he said, there are 49% silver, a gold and 51% silver. So our next testing that we need to do on that is isotopic ratio testing to find out if the metals of gold and silver are off world or not. Hmm. Now, you know, I mean, there's just so many elements most likely out there. (1:13:00)

And, you know, certainly gold and silver are most likely on other planets, I would imagine, you know, just as a composition of elements that are found so abundantly here. Someone wanted to know in the message board, who pays for this analysis? Good point. Thank you for volunteering for my let's pay the bill. I pay for it myself. I am a small real estate investor, and I normally keep my family broke most of the time doing this stuff because our work is philanthropic. (1:13:39)

I have never charged abductees any money for their surgeries, for the paper they write on, for the hypnotic anesthesia I may do with them in the operating room. They pay for nothing. Our work is completely philanthropic. If I went through this, I have I just can't imagine charging people for the very same thing that I went through. I just I don't mind people who do a lot of abduction. (1:14:06)

People do charge people for it and so on for different things. Hypnosis and so on. I just don't do that. And what is this hypnotic anesthesia? Can you talk a little bit about that? Certainly. I was just speaking at a conference in Washington State this last weekend, which we did real well. They doubled the attendance. And a lady asked me, she came up and said, I'm a hypnotherapist. (1:14:34)

And I said, OK. She said, so what are you? And I said, well, we don't know, but it's growing at an alarming rate. And I said, well, actually, I'm a master hypnotherapist, for one. She said, what's that? And I said, you know, the person that certified you? (1:14:45)

---

And she said, yes. I said, that'd be somebody like me. I said, so I certify people in hypnotherapy. I said, number two, I'm a medical hypnotherapist, which means I'm qualified to take care of people on a medical level with hypnotherapy. And three, I'm a hypnotic anesthesia therapist. And she said, what's that? And I said, when a lot of these people with implants, as an example, goes to surgery, I'll do hypnotic anesthesia with them so that they don't have to have a local or a general anesthetic if they choose not to, if I work with them, or a minimum of it, whatever they choose. (1:15:20)

The least that I'll do is to give them healing suggestions. And they will normally heal up about three to five times faster than in a normal surgery. Now, would an MD actually use hypnotic anesthetic? Has anyone used that and actually in an operating room? I'll give you two examples. I was doing one surgery. And Whitley Strieber was there and a bunch of other people were watching. (1:15:50)

And I was using full hypnotic anesthesia with this individual. And of course, now the TV people, they insure themselves to the hilt. And so they hired a full anesthesia doctor, anesthesiologist, to be right there behind me with all her equipment. And we're walking down, the lady, the anesthesiologist is walking with me to where the patient's at. We're getting ready to prep the patient. (1:16:18)

And she starts smarting off and says, who do you think you are? Think you can just do hypnosis on somebody and exercise them? I'm an anesthesiologist, blah, blah, blah. I said, listen to me, young lady. I said, I'm paying your salary here. You just get over there with your equipment and just be quiet. I'll tell you what to do. If we need you, we'll call for you. (1:16:42)

And then she looked at me and smiled and says, I'm a hypnotist too. And I said, you're kidding. She says, I have never seen hypnotic anesthesia. And I'm so excited. I can't stand it. And I said, well, you just fasten your seatbelt and take notes because this is going to happen. And it did. And she just lost it. She said, that is just so amazing. (1:17:02)

And the doctor who was cutting on this individual said the following, this has got to be killing them. And the patient at that point moved. And I said, shut up. I said, you are a person in authority and respected. And I said, he is hearing everything you're saying, every word. You think they're out cold, can't hear anything, do anything, don't know anything. That's not true. (1:17:30)

They hear everything more than you do. And from then on, I gave a prep talk to all our doctors before we ever did any surgeries. We had a brain surgeon present at one and two cardiovascular surgeons. So I've used all kinds of interesting people in our implant surgery. All right. (1:17:53)

---

Let's talk about the implant surgery. How many have you been involved in? I've done 20, I've conducted and or supervised 25 implant surgeries to date. The last one being in India. Okay. And what have you found when you've actually looked at these things when they're removed? Well, what we've found is that not everything you remove from these people are quote unquote alien. And unfortunately, the internet says something different, but the internet doesn't know because it wasn't there. (1:18:27)

I was. And the fact is that in some of these objects, the fact the first two surgeries we did on one day where Roger was involved in that particular one. In fact, he told me that I was nuts and that there was no such thing to this, that it was a bunch of bull. And his friend, Alice Levy, who is anyway, she's a very good friend of mine. (1:18:54)

Best friend of both of us. And she said, just do it. Just listen to this man. I think he's right. And he did. That night, we removed the objects and sent the pathology off. And I told him if this is alien related, Roger, what we're going to find is there's no signs of inflammatory response, either chronic or acute. And there'll be the wrong kind of nerve supply there. (1:19:20)

And I just listed out three, four things. And the next day, the pathology report came back from the doctor, said no signs of inflammatory response, either chronic or acute. And keratinous material surrounded the objects, which floored the pathologist. He says keratin is not found inside the body. So it doesn't make any sense how that could be. It just, it's not found deep inside the body. (1:19:49)

It just isn't. So it couldn't have happened. I said, well, it's been filmed with 17 people present, one lawyer, two doctors and myself and the patient and witnesses and nurses. And he said, I don't care who was present. He said it can't happen. And it didn't. So that's why we film everything. What we found later, Bob Bigelow and his crew, he called me on the phone one day and said, made an interesting statement. (1:20:17)

He said, I have five doctors and five men around me. He said, all of them are PhDs. And one of them is a doctor, an MD with two PhDs. And I said, okay. And he said, you seem to be able to find a lot of evidence. No one else even knew existed. And you seem to be able to find a lot of it. (1:20:36)

How do you account for that? And I said, well, if you want to find a cop, you want to find a donut, go find a cop. They didn't laugh. I thought it was funny. I said, if you want to find real evidence of an alien nature, I said, go find you a Native American Indian tracker. And they, to this day, have never heeded my advice. (1:20:57)

The point is that the 18 scientists, we did a presentation in front of these 18 scientists, and they all agreed to fund our research. (1:21:08)

---

And I told them I wanted it done as a blinded study. And therefore, no one would know anything involved in the research. And they took the four objects from the two people and sent it to Los Alamos. And Los Alamos did an excellent study. And then they sent it off to New Mexico Tech. New Mexico Tech, they did qualitative and quantitative analysis. And basically, what they found, ultimately, is the materials were extraterrestrial in origin and from a rare meteorite, either the Wittmannstatten or the Yauchung meteorite. (1:21:46)

And everything was going real well until someone on our staff did something really stupid. They broke the rules, called Los Alamos and said, what did you find? And they said, who are you? And the individual said, I'm Dr. Roger Lear. And they said, who are you? He said, I'm the one who removed the alien implants from those people. And they ran for cover. (1:22:16)

We had reports changed and all kinds of stuff. But since, oh my gosh, it ruined the blinded study. I have heard of things like this. And actually, Dr. Melba Ketchum was on a show I was listening to recently. And that had to do with Bigfoot DNA. And she did blind studies like that. And as soon as they found out that it had something to do with Bigfoot, they ran the other way. (1:22:46)

Thank you. Yes. Not uncommon at all. Yes, yes. So I just want to say this. Anyone can call into the show and ask a question. Now, the only drawback until I get this phone thing figured out is I have to put our guests on hold while you ask your question. You're welcome to call in if you would like. And that number is 603-967-4030. Excuse me. (1:23:14)

So what was the last surgery? And why did you do it in India? Was the patient in India? The patient was Indian and from another country. But their relatives lived in India. And so I had reviewed the records and was most impressed with my two alien hunter investigators in India and what they had done and interviewed the prospect several times and was most impressed and had already looked at the x-rays and all the evidence that was there. (1:23:53)

The individual is a contactee, by the way. That means a contactee basically is a person that's had these events, contact events or abduction events, and they don't seem to mind. Because as far as they're concerned, it's either for our best good or some other reason like that. Do you mind hanging on for just a second? We have a question coming in. And I'll be right back to you. (1:24:16)

Don't go anywhere, Daryl. OK? OK. All right. Skype caller. Caller, you're on the line. Can you close your question? And I'll have to hang up with you right after. Mm-hmm. Hi. And your name, please? Donna. Oh, hi, Donna. How are you? Hi. Good. How are you? Good. Good to talk to you. (1:24:36)

---

And what's your question for Daryl? The question is, what does Daryl think the functions of the implants might be? Does he have any ideas about what the actual function is? And I'll hang up to listen to the answer. All right. Thanks a lot, Donna. Daryl, Donna called in with a question. She wanted to know what you thought the actual function of the implants were, and what you found out about that. (1:25:06)

We found that, first of all, the implants are... And this is very important. And thank you for that question. What's very important is to understand that implants are extremely rare. I know people have said all kinds of things on the internet. Listen to me carefully. I'm the guy that's doing the surgeries. And I discovered this in, like I said, 1960 at age 12 in my own event. (1:25:34)

Implants are extremely rare. I don't know why, but almost every abductee I meet thinks they have one or want me to examine them or look at all their x-rays or whatever. I look at hundreds of x-rays every year and find almost no implants. They're very, very rare to find. That's number one. Number two, implants are invasive in nature simply by the fact that they're inserted in you in some way or manner or way. (1:26:01)

And they're invasive, in my opinion, in some of the things that they may do. One of the things that we have discovered in some of the implants, they seem to suggest that some of them may be altering neurotransmitters like serotonin, dopamine, and even potassium. According to one neuropharmacologist, if that's true, Mr. Sims, whoever is running that show, a government, a doctor, or an alien, it makes no difference. (1:26:29)

They're pretty much in charge of your happiness, sadness, depression, or whatever. They own you. So that's one of the things that could be going on with implants. Other is that it may be used for a part of a process to upload or download data. I'm looking at the possibility of some of the implant phenomena involving itself in a pretty interesting and high-tech type of process in which fluorescence is involved, and it's called fluorescent DNA tagging. (1:27:11)

We think that there might be something to that too. But again, we're still studying this stuff. It is not a simple subject at all. Now, when you're saying we, can you explain who's involved? Is there a team involved or something? There is a team involved in different levels of this stuff. Generally, when I mentioned that some of the things we're doing quite private now is we're assembling a team specifically to do some testing on a very interesting laboratory level. (1:27:47)

And it's going to be fascinating in its concept. And rather than make a bunch of wild predictions of what we may or may not find, I'll simply let you know as soon as if we find anything out. But we're going to do all kinds of different kinds of testing on all of the objects that I have independently. And then we're going to do them all at the same time just to see what happens. (1:28:19)

Okay. Now, if you just joined us, we're on with Daryl Sims. And Phil wanted to know what frequency and what was the bandwidth? (1:28:32)

---

Did you say something was transmitting a frequency? The neurotransmitters we were talking about, it's not a frequency in that regard. The DNA tagging that we think might be going on, we haven't proven that yet. It's a suspicion for different reasons. If DNA tagging is going on, it's going to require some pretty extensive testing to do this sort of thing. Some of these tests are over $14,000 a piece. (1:29:06)

I have 15 samples of DNA fluorescence from the alien already. What that translates to in our common thinking here tonight is that if you commit a felony, in most states, they will take your DNA and they will fingerprint you. So they have two ways of identifying you. If there's another crime that occurs, they're going to run all those crimes past this big DNA and testing that they have. (1:29:36)

We have the first, quote unquote, fingerprints and DNA of an alien presence. We have about 15 samples so far. So that's pretty astounding to me, but it takes a huge amount of money to do this stuff. Wow. I can't even imagine. $14,000. So, and you've been actually self-funding this as you go along? I have, because I just, I only have one complaint. I have never understood this. (1:30:13)

And this is a complaint that I think probably your audience would share with me as well. I'm amazed at how many people we have in the UFO community that have, and I'm not talking about the average person. I'm talking about a few people out there and they're very, very wealthy or very well-to-do and have contributed nothing to this UFO field. And that just absolutely astounds me that people like myself are out here on a shoestring doing everything out of their own pocket and keeping their families broke just so that they can answer a question. (1:30:49)

So somebody says, well, when are you going to get that done? Whenever I get the rest of the money, probably. Now you mentioned Bob Bigelow earlier. Is he, does he have, is he helping out in any type of way with any of this? He funded our next three surgeries after the first two that I did in Camarillo. And he funded the next three. (1:31:13)

And since then, I told Bob, I said, you know, and we got along real well, and some people don't like him, and I got along real well with him. But the thing is that he is, he's, he's definitely an information gatherer, and he collects it as fast as he can, apparently. And I could tell some stories, but I won't. But the point is that he owns an aerospace industry and air company, and he has an inflatable space station. (1:31:53)

And I mean, that's, that's astounding. That, in my opinion, puts him out there past NASA. So he's doing real well. Right. Now, someone wanted to know, and you already spoke about this. Bobby, you just joined the show. So he already spoke that he did actually work with Dr. Lear. But Dr. Lear only actually performed one of the surgeries you said earlier, right? Yes? (1:32:20)

That's correct. And anything on the foot he could do, anything other than that, he would be obviously, he would get in trouble. (1:32:28)

---

And actually, later he did. He ended up facing charges before the Podiatry Board of the State of California. And they busted him and took his license for, suspended his license for three years. And anyway, that's a sad story. And I don't want to get into all that. But sure. But he wasn't doing anything for a while. That was another reason I also fired him, because he told me he didn't have any baggage whenever I took him on as a partner. (1:32:58)

And he had several lawsuits pending. And I just, I don't want to have anything to do with him at that point. Oh, I'm sorry to hear that. Yeah. He seemed like a real nice gentleman. He's a real affable guy. Don't get me wrong. I always thought a lot of Roger. But sometimes he didn't always tell the whole story. But anyway, that's neither here nor there. (1:33:22)

And he's gone and we're moving forward. Now, how many people would you say that will contact you and talk about implants? Well, at the last conference I was at this last weekend, there must have been probably 15 or 20 people that came up and showed me their lumps, bumps, scars and whatever, and thought they had an implant. One guy, I found two people that I was interested in, really. (1:33:52)

One of them was an elderly lady. And I took some pictures of where they took the implant out of her. And her medical situation indicated it could be very real. And there was a guy that walked up inside his arm. He had an, he said, I got bit by a dog when I was real little. And I think its tooth broke off in my arm. (1:34:15)

And he spins this thing around in under his skin. The thing must have been a half inch long. And it was huge. I was the strangest, one of the strangest things I've ever seen. The only other time I've seen anything like it is an implant that's in a lady's arm that's on my website, alienhunter.org. You can click on it and see the film of her in Brazil. And he had one like that in his arm and he's turning it around, spinning it. (1:34:37)

And I said, what makes you think that's the tooth of a dog? He said, well, it might, it has to be. And I said, okay, but you've had UFO events. Yeah. How do you know that's the tooth of a dog? Well, it must be. And I said, well, sometimes these are screen memories. These are imagery left with us that are not consistent with what happened. (1:34:58)

And it was the strangest looking thing I ever saw. That was real interesting. But there must have been at least a dozen to come up with the belief they had an implant. Definitely. Wow. Um, now what about the ones that people are, I think you mentioned Whitley Strieber. Um, he, I happened to catch a film, a documentary with him in it a while back. (1:35:20)

And there was, um, there was, I don't know if it was a Roger Lear or someone was trying to, uh, connect to some type of what could have been an implant or was called an implant. (1:35:34)

---

And it was moving. Have you ever, have you ever encountered any? The story and the, uh, it definitely wouldn't have been Roger may have been present, but he wouldn't, he wouldn't be doing the surgery. Believe me, that, uh, that could get you arrested if you're a podiatrist and you're operating on some part of the body. So he wouldn't, he would not definitely be doing that. (1:35:51)

Um, the, uh, uh, there, there are objects that, uh, do appear to move. And, uh, they seem to be, uh, motivated by an external force. And, um, uh, the fact is that one of them that I'm referring to specifically was actually in a cattle mutilation. Oh, wow. That's something. Now I found it with a metal detector and he, it kept clicking and he noticed that it was in another location. (1:36:29)

Then he, he kept, then he started following it around the cow, the dead cow. Jeez. And then, uh, like, uh, dumb, in my opinion, mistake, he goes to pick up some people at the airport and comes back and the implants gone. Yeah. Um, we have some questions up on the message board, but quickly, I want to talk about this and that is some scoop marks. (1:36:53)

You hear about them. Have you ever looked into them as well? Yes. Uh, in the conference this weekend, uh, I said, how many of you have a scoop mark? And several of them raised their hands. And I said, let me show you what it looks like. And I stuck my leg up there and showed them a five eighths of an inch giant scoop mark. (1:37:07)

And I said, I was four years old when I got this from the event one night, next morning at this, I had this carterized wound. I said, if your leg is only about three inches thick and you've got a five eighths of an inch scoop mark out of the front of your shin, I said, that's looks like a crater on the moon. (1:37:28)

It's so big. So I was wondering as a little kid, why, where, where the scab was at. I mean, and as I touched it and pushed on it, this is going to sound really, really off the wall, but it's, it's every word of it's true. As I pushed on it, I kept asking myself the question, where's the scab and how did this happen? And I heard this voice like a memory, like a memory tape, I guess from some them. (1:37:52)

And it says you fell and hurt yourself. Well, that is absolutely 100% not true. How about that was carterized. And we've studied the, the scoop marks. And what we've found is that they're, they are caused by an intense ultraviolet light and it's called solar elastosis. And it's carterizes the wound rapidly. One of our abductees before we ever started exploring medically the, the scoop marks, she drew an object, a device, a pencil-like device that had a little rotating cut thing on it that cut and took the, made the cut, took the skin off, and then it carterized the wound with a bright light. (1:38:39)

She discovered that before we ever found anything out medically about that. Isn't that something. There's a question of someone that spoke with you. Matthew spoke with you last year and he says that you told him privately about a military person, person having seen an alien through a sniper scope. Would you be willing to talk about that story? Sure. It took me about a year to get this short little story. (1:39:08)

That's how secretive the guy was. Anyway, uh, I was telling this story at dinner at a, um, at, uh, up in Minnesota, I believe it was Minnesota, Wisconsin or Minnesota, one of the two. And I was at a conference and we're at dinner. It's a meet, meet and greet dinner. And Stanton Friedman is sitting across the table from me, uh, catty-cornered. And this lady was asking a question about what is one of the more interesting things you've ever heard about alien contact? And I said, well, um, I said a Vietnam, uh, American soldier, Vietnam sniper, um, contacted me. (1:39:47)

And as soon as I told the story, uh, Stanton's ears lit up and he told, asked the lady who was talking to him, be quiet, please. He said, I want to hear this. And I told the story and he said, I have never heard anything like this my entire life. (1:40:02)

And I said, I've got actually several of these, but this is the kind of an important one. The guy, uh, was, uh, is, is you, when you have a sniper, you also have a spotter. (1:40:09)

---

He's the guy looking through his binoculars, looking for the target. The targets in this case are, um, uh, North Vietnamese officers. That's who they're going to take out. They're going to try to decimate so the guys don't have good leadership. That's the idea. So, um, he said, so my spotter says, you're not going to believe this. (1:40:34)

He said, what? And he gave me the location and he said, I sighted it in with my starlight scope. And I said, what the... and he gave some colorful adjectives and I said, what did you see? And he said, there was a, he said, now you got to understand, I don't believe in you, this Mr. Sims. I don't believe in aliens. (1:40:55)

I don't believe in nothing. I don't think it's all crazy. And I said, okay. He said, I'm looking through my telescope and I'm looking at one of them. And he's in the midst of that meeting of a North Vietnamese officer and, uh, and the, the other troops that are there. I said, who were they all armed? He said, every one of them had AK-47s. I said, my next question, who seemed to be in charge of that meeting? He said, there's no question the bug was. (1:41:29)

And I said, what did you do next? He said, what I do with what I do for a living. He said, their head explodes just like everybody else's. And I said, I'm sure I would love to heard the conversation, how the North Vietnamese officer explained to his cadre and others of why bug juice, so to speak, was sprayed all over him. And he wasn't shot because everybody knows that he would be the first target. (1:41:56)

Nobody would miss that. So the second story I ever heard was fascinating. It was, I was at a conference in, this was in Denver and a guy waited till everybody got finished talking with me. And he stood there for a while and says, I said, you have a question or anything? And he said, I do. He said, I don't believe in aliens and all that. And I said, okay, that's fine with me. (1:42:19)

I don't care. He said, I'm a sight hunter. And I said, I understand exactly what that is. And he said, I was coming up over this little hill and I saw something. I instantly saw something moving. I sighted in on it with my scope. And he said, as soon as I saw it, I fired. I knew what it was. And he said, I couldn't believe it, but I shot it. I said, what did you see in the scope? (1:42:41)

He said, a seven foot praying mantis. And I said, did you hit it? And he says, Mr. Sims, I'm a sight hunter and I'm a good one. I never miss. He said, I saw, I fired. He said, I saw the bullet hit. And I heard, I heard the report of when it impacted. He said, I just want to ask you, how could that happen? And I said, what happened after that? He said, it disappeared. (1:43:07)

As soon as I shot it, it disappeared. And I said, in my opinion, this is what was happening. (1:43:13)

---

The UFO is further on the other side of the hill and can't see you coming up on the other side of the hill. The entities already left and already abducted whoever he's going to abduct. So he's getting out in the open. They're fixing to beam him out. At that instant, you come up over the hill, see him, pop him. (1:43:36)

And then they, they're trying to get him in as fast as they could, because they see you at that point and they can't get him in fast enough. And you ended up shooting it. And he said, that makes a lot of sense. He said, I just never could figure out how they could make a mistake like that. I said, the mistake is the fact that they didn't see you. (1:43:49)

Now, now what happened to these bodies of these things? Well, and in the case with the, the, the Vietnamese, nobody's going to go down there and where you just fired a shot and see if anybody wants to shoot at you. You're, you'll give away your position as a sniper. Nobody's going to do that. They, they just, I mean, this is in the evening time anyway. (1:44:19)

So he got splattered all over the darkness, basically. The second thing is, in the other case, there's a broad daylight with the guy shot. And, and he said, just as soon as I shot and hit it, he said it disappeared. So I said, that's it. I said, I would have loved to have seen, seen him up close and personal. (1:44:37)

And he said, me too. He said, I don't know what the thing was. I still don't know. And I said, well, these are beings, in my opinion, that are made, hatched, cloned, or manufactured for the purpose of interaction with mankind. And I said, you just simply shot one. I said, I said, many people think they're sentient beings from other worlds. (1:44:58)

And so, and I said, I have not found the slightest piece of evidence to support it. I said, in fact, when I asked people and questioned them, what's your entity look like? And they said, oh, he had three fingers and he was, he was wonderful or whatever. I said, okay, that's fair. (1:45:13)

How do you suppose you build a spacecraft with three fingers and no opposing thumb? Oh, well, they're just real smart. I said, you're not answering my question. As a second of all, I said, the guy's got an IQ about 85. It ain't going to happen. That's my point is somebody's doing it for them. (1:45:32)

All right. Chris up on the message board had this question and he wanted to know, do you have any ideas about instituting protocol for the identification of abduction, ease and collection of evidence? I do. In fact, I'm looking at my abduction case protocols from the alien hunter right now. Preliminary paperwork, releases and forms, abductee contact forms. If they fill out the paperwork, about a 20 page. (1:45:57)

And people are asking me that this weekend, say, what is it like? And I said, well, I said, we all have a UFO hat, don't we? By that, I mean, we're all into UFOs. We love the stories. We love all this. And I said, I call that our abductee or a contact or UFO hats, what I call it. I see UFO hats are fun, but they've been fooled before. (1:46:13)

We've gotten fooled by people. We've been lied to, cheated and told whoppers and things that weren't true. They said, well, that's true. And I said, okay. Having said that, I said, I have seven hats that I wear whenever I do my work. One of them is my cop hat. And I said, when that hat gets put on, it doesn't get fooled like the abductee hat does. (1:46:40)

I said, it's kind of rough around the edges and a little intimidating. I said, when you're filling out that paperwork, I said, I'm watching your handwriting. I'm a handwriting analyst. I'm looking at your handwriting for exaggeration, for lying, for all kinds of things just in your writing. (1:46:54)

---

I'm also looking, I said, I teach on the college level how to determine whether people are lying or telling the truth. And I said, I'm watching everything about you while you're filling out your paperwork. You're going to do a series of drawings there for me, the six pictures in the symbolic profile, part of that form. (1:47:15)

And I said, when you do that, I said, I'm going to know all kinds of stuff about you. So when you finish with that, if I hand you back your abduction papers and say, or whatever, and send you on your way, I don't believe a word you did, not nothing that you said. (1:47:31)

I said, that's pretty rare because we usually, when people fill that out, they know I'm going to catch them. And most people are very truthful about that sort of thing. So yeah, I have standards for that. The preliminary work, paperwork, forms, releases, we do those, of course. This goes into all the things I've talked about. (1:47:47)

And the secondary portion of that is the meeting where I re-listen to you tell your story. Usually it's on film because I'm going to review that over and over and over and look for all kinds of things. And then I'm going to give you an alien flip chart additional test. (1:48:04)

This is a visual flip chart where you see like what we do with prison, what people who have gone, have been assaulted by either rapist or murder, attempted murder and things like that. And we, where people assemble their own face basically out of these flip charts. I do this with the alien and I've got some fake ones in there too. So we like those. (1:48:23)

And generally you'll see a bit of a visceral response if they get to their guy, if they really had an event and they'll know who he is immediately as soon as they get him up there. And that's kind of important because 55% of your communication is your physiology. 38% is your tone, pitch and timbre of your voice. Only 7% is your words. Yes. I've talked to Ben Hanson. I got to meet him out in Phoenix and we got into a discussion, you know, he's former FBI and all the different parts of your body language just show so many different signs, whether you're being truthful or not. It's pretty amazing. (1:49:06)

We do have a couple more questions and one of them was came up earlier. Can anyone see any of the filming anywhere of any of the surgeries for implants? They will eventually because I'm going to start putting them up on our website. I do have the one of our surgery. I filmed everything when I was in India and I had assistance assisting me with a broadcast quality small camera that I had. (1:49:41)

But as of this moment, no. But the fact is I quit selling my implant surgical video because I found a couple of people out. They took my copyright off of it and sold it as if it were their own. (1:49:59)

---

That really angered me. So I just I quit selling them all together. Yeah. Well, I hear about things like that all the time. And one other person up on the message board wanted to know what you thought of David Jacobs' work. David Jacobs. I know David and I think he's a very decent man. I met him in in Brasilia, Brazil, the capital of Brazil. He waited while about 100 people waited in line to see me. And he walked up to me at the end in his time and he said the most kind thing to me. (1:50:34)

He said, Mr. Sims, he said, I am embarrassed to say that I am not familiar with your work. And having done this work for about, I guess, 30, 40 years, he said, I did not know there was evidence like that, that I just saw you demonstrate up there in your presentation. He said, I had no idea. (1:50:56)

And I said, well, Dr. Jacobs, I said, you have done some seminal work with Bud and and Dr. Mack and others. And I said, so I'm very proud of you. And his basic thesis is that we're being ravaged with hybrid hybridization and so on. And they're basically going to take over and do all of this. (1:51:19)

I'm not so sure that program is going to work because we have good intel since 1992. And I mean, really good intel from the alien themselves, that in fact, the alien quote unquote program is in its last 100 years. And we don't know whether that's 10 years left, five years left, two years left or 40 years left. We don't know. But where did that where did that information come from? (1:51:41)

In a mass abduction of eight people in two states and several cities. My engineer with senior engineer was one of the people taken. And he said the craft, they were all they were all picked up in small craft and taken to a massive craft near the moon. And he told me the story consciously. And I said, he said, sound pretty far fetched. (1:52:08)

And I said, it does for fact. And he said, eight, seven other people were there. And so I separated all of them at that point. And the other states would let them talk to each other and got the same exact story from everybody. So the bottom line is the we got more information out of that one case and more evidence than we had in all our cases to that entire point in history. (1:52:31)

Just from that one case, an implant fell out of a lady's eye after that mass abduction on her desk in front of her boss. And I have it to this day, of course. It was an ocular implant. But the it seems that according to one, and I don't mean the little guy, I mean one of them with a brain, because the doctor type alien, the one looks like the little gray, he's got an IQ around 140, 150. The mantis may have one around 160, 170, 180. I mean, they're way up there. (1:52:58)

And the human types, the Nordic type will, they'll be very intelligent as well. (1:53:04)

---

But they relayed, one of them relayed this information. Dale saw it accidentally on a wall in a chart. And he, when he questioned about it, they, there was only one little tiny part that was not complete. And he asked what that was. And he said, that's our contact with man. And he said, what do you mean? He said, that's what all this left. (1:53:25)

And what the impression I got out of all of that and all the information I have to date is that at that point, it's checkmate and the game is over and they lost. Whatever it is they were supposed to do, they did not succeed at, in my opinion. And what do you think they're doing? Why do you think they're doing what they're doing? If, if they are indeed here abducting people, what, and implants and all that stuff, what do you think their a hundred year purpose is? (1:53:56)

Well, the, the, the program they've been involved with, according to the engineer, was about 6,000 years long because he multiplied that hundred. He's an engineer, is what they do. They, I mean, how meticulous these people are. He multiplied that whole chart, that whole, he said, it looked like Indianapolis runway is a three-dimensional chart. And he said, it looked like about 6,000 years. (1:54:22)

He said, when you multiply all the, all the little spaces there and the, what my thinking is, is this, and it is not a belief it's thinking it. And if I get better information, I'll think something else. But my thinking at this point is that they're, they have bent over backwards to try to convince us that they're aliens from other worlds. Before they started that whopper, they didn't have a story like that. (1:54:49)

There was no story at all. In fact, they never told anybody anything. They didn't want anybody to know. And when people like me started remembering, like when I was four and a half years old, the cat's out of the bag. So one of the things they did, and Jacobs and others will tell you the same exact thing. (1:55:08)

Hopkins, any of them would have told the same thing. They started installing blocks in the memories of their abductees. And many of the abductees could not remember. Another thing they did was it, which is the finest and best false memory syndrome ever developed. And it was developed by the alien themselves. And when you come back from an event, you say, well, a three foot owl or a giant deer or something with large black eyes was there. (1:55:33)

No, it was something with large black eyes, but it wasn't a deer and it wasn't a wolf and it wasn't a three foot owl walking down the street wounded. It impacted them. Wow. There's one other question I have, but before that, I wanted to tell this story real quickly. When I was in Phoenix at the UFO Congress, I was walking my dog out on around the grounds over by the casino and there was a casino worker there sitting, relaxing, not smoking or anything, but just on her break. (1:56:10)

And she talked about my dog and all this stuff. And she said, what's going on over here? What type of conference is this? And I said, oh, it's a UFO conference. And she said, oh, really? So, well, that's interesting. She said, I saw a UFO before. And I said, really? (1:56:24)

---

And I always, I love hearing stories from people that aren't like involved in UFOs in any type of way. They're just, I consider them, I wouldn't say an outsider, but just someone that is not involved in the UFO field in any type of way or even went to a conference or anything. So she said, I said to her, can you please tell me your story? And she said, sure. (1:56:48)

And she said, my friend and I were driving up in Hopi country, not far from here. She said the name of the town. I never heard of it before. And she said, all of a sudden on one of the mesas, a like big dark object, they said, she said, it looked at first, like it was just like floated off the top of it. (1:57:07)

And then she said, then it came right over the very top of our car. And she said, all of a sudden there was a blast of light. It came right down into the car, really, really bright light. And she said, myself and my, my friend who was driving panicked and she just like gunned it. And then I said, and drove like 30 miles flat, you know, as fast as she could basically. (1:57:31)

And it was very straight highway and all that. And I said, wow, that's an amazing story. I said, and I asked her if she had anything like missing time or anything like that. She had no idea what I was talking about. All of a sudden, she said, you know, one weird thing did happen right after that. And I said, what's that? And she said, an owl as big as the car came down right at the windshield. (1:57:50)

Oh my God. So that was a story I heard out in Phoenix from a casino worker that just happened to be on a break. And I thought I'd share that with everyone. We've got just a couple of minutes. And we did have Mike Clellon on a while talking about owls. So just to finish up that story real quickly, I did ask her if I could send her information along to Mike and she said, sure. (1:58:17)

So I think they're in communication. So he was pretty excited to talk to her. The one last question I have, and that's it for the evening. And that is, where did these implants that are removed reside? Do you keep them in some type of cold storage in a safe or something like that? They reside with me and yes, they are protected and hidden. (1:58:43)

And I'm most protected of them because they will disappear. Even if you leave them with doctors, they will take off with them if they can. I understand. I totally agree with you on that. Can you tell the listening audience, you mentioned many times your website. Can you tell how someone would find your website, please? Yes, it's alienhunter.org. Alienhunter.org. And if you want to write me or hear any of the information that we have tonight, it's free. (1:59:16)

We never charge anybody anything. So you're welcome to contact us at alienhunter.org. Just go to Alien Hunter there and click on that little tab and that'll reach me at any time. And I'll be glad to answer your questions. I do answer all my emails. (1:59:25)

---

Are you still there? Yes. Okay. Very good. Thanks so much. It's been a real pleasure. A lot of fun talking to you tonight. Thank you, Martin. You're a great host. Thank you. Thanks a lot.

(2025-07-24)