Local PC で動く AI の性能

前置き

Local PC で動く AI がどの程度なのか、テストした。DeepL で和訳したが、英語の方が格段に良い性能なので、質問と回答は英語で行った。

結果

約12分間の証言音声の 文字起こし をそのまま一気に入力して要約が可能だった。思考時間は 7秒。

なお、ChatGPT-4o で同じ作業をさせた結果は別記事、

Jim Penniston の証言動画 : 文字起こし＋ 和訳 ＋ AIの要約

に含まれている。

モデル

deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-7b

コメント

正直、Local PC 上の AI でここまでの性能が出ることには驚く。

体感でしかないが、1～2年前の ChatGPT の性能に匹敵している気がする。

回答 の和訳 : DeepL(2024-07 model)

わかりました。1980年に発生したUFO着陸事件の記録を整理するタスクがあります。依頼者は既にテキストを証言者とナレーターの発言に分割しようとしたのですが、タイムスタンプの管理で混乱しています。私の目標は、提供された構造を確認し、重要な観察点を詳細な箇条書きリストにまとめ、特に意識の変化や感覚体験に焦点を当てた内容を作成することです。

まず、記録全体を注意深く読み、文脈を理解します。これは、1980年の夏にイギリスで未確認飛行物体（UFO）を目撃した警備員の証言です。証言者は、物体の外観、サイズ、色、体への静電気のような感覚、そして周囲の時間感覚が鈍るという主観的な体験について述べています。物体上のシンボルに関する言及や、その存在理由に関する仮説も含まれています。

記録では、証言者の発言（「Peniston」を含む部分）が証人の観察の後に記載されています。これは非常に重要です。なぜなら、これらを正確に区別する必要があるからです。ユーザーは既にこの作業を試みていますが、タイムスタンプに基づいて一部の見落としや誤った対応がある可能性があります。私の役割は、各ポイントを証人かナレーターに正しく割り当てることです。

まず、「Peniston」という単語がすべての出現箇所を特定します。これらは、事件を担当したセキュリティ監督官の発言であり、飛行物の起源や事件後の調査プロセスなど、状況の説明を提供しています。

次に、証人の観察（「I」で表される）をそれぞれ抽出し、該当するポイントの下にリスト化します。これには、クラフトの構造、サイズ、色、静電気のような感覚体験、不審なシンボル、主観的な時間膨張、その他の注目すべき観察が含まれます。

特に、見落とされがちだが包括的な理解に重要な細部に注意を払う必要があります。例えば、証人の正確な身長（6'2"）は、周辺の人物との比較でクラフトの規模を説明する文脈を提供します。

各ポイントの明確さも重要です。記録がやや混乱していたり、重複していたりする可能性があるため、各箇条書きが特定の観察内容を要約し、不要な情報を含まないようにします。

用語の一貫性を維持し、異なる証人または関係者間の混乱を避けることも重要です。例えば、警備員（証人）とナレーター（ペニストン）を区別する必要があります。

すべてのポイントが正しく特定され分類された後、証人のセクション下に構造化された箇条書きリストに整理します。これにより、各詳細を体系的に確認しやすくなります。

最後に、すべての情報を整理した後、このプロセスで情報が漏れたり誤って割り当てられたりしていないか、徹底的なチェックを行います。重要な観察内容が正確に表現され、トランскриプトを確認する誰もが容易にアクセスできることが重要です。

提供された記録に基づいて整理された箇条書きリストです。証人（「私」）とナレーター（ペニストン）の発言を分離し、意識の変容体験を含む主要な観察点を強調しています：

証人の観察：

1. 物体の識別：

• 物体は三角形形状で、黒色で、滑らかなガラスのような質感でした。
• 物体の表面は不明ですが、金属のように見えました。

2. サイズと寸法：

• クラフトのサイズは、約9フィート×9フィート×9フィートでした。
• 証人の身長（6フィート2インチ）を基に推定された高さは約7フィートでした。

3. 感覚体験：

• 皮膚、髪、服に静電気のような感覚が感じられました。
• クラフトの周囲の直近エリアでは、時間の流れが引き延ばされるような異常な感覚が体験されました。
• 探査後、時計に時間差が生じ、物体付近では時間が遅く流れたように見えました。

4. 視覚的観察：

• 内部の布地から赤と青の模様のような動きが確認されました。
• 物体の側面に刻まれた記号が確認されましたが、その意味は不明です。
• 物体は最初の接触時に白い光を放ち、離陸を試みる際にその光がより明るくなりました。

5. 運用面：

• 吸気口や排気口などの航空機の特徴は検出されませんでした。
• 離陸前、機体は長時間にわたり無音で動作し、離陸時はわずかに聞こえる音と共に地面から2フィートほど浮き上がりました。

6. 理論的考察：

• 目撃者は、機体の非大気圏的性質にもかかわらず、修理メカニズムや地球外起源の可能性を含む理論を検討しました。

7. 行動的・感情的影響：

• 体験は混乱、恐怖、驚嘆、そして監視されているような感覚の混合を引き起こしました。
• 飛行体の突然の出現と消失は不可解であり、全体的な不気味な雰囲気を強化しました。

ナレーターの見解（ペニストン）：

1. 飛行体の起源と背景：

• ペニストンは飛行体の起源が不明であると指摘しましたが、自己修理中または故障中である可能性を推測しました。
• この出来事は極めて異常なものとされ、軍関係者による徹底的な調査が行われました。
• 物体は、潜在的な地球外生命体の痕跡を特定するため、体系的に調査されました。

2. 調査と記録：

• 物体はシンボルのスケッチで記録されましたが、さらに詳しい説明は行われませんでした。
• 証言者は「UFO」という用語を避け、機密保持のため軍事用語を使用しました。

3. 感情的・職業的影響：

• 遭遇は重大なストレスを引き起こし、信頼性やキャリアへの影響に関する職業上の懸念が生じました。
• ペン・ピストンは、他者が独立して調査を進める間、発見を早期に開示しない責任を感じました。

この構造化されたアプローチは、明確さ、詳細への配慮、主観的な観察と文脈分析の区別を保証します。

入力

展開

The following is a transcript of the testimony of a security guard who witnessed a UFO landing incident in the UK in 1980 from close range. The statements of the witness and the narrator are mixed. Statements containing the proper name “Peniston” are those of the narrator. Statements containing “I” referring to the witness are those of the witness.

Please organize this transcript into as detailed a bullet-point list as possible. Pay particular attention to the witness's subjective experiences of altered consciousness or sensory perception, such as changes in cognitive function or unusual sensory changes, and list even minor details without omission.

######## Here's exactly what I was thinking. I'm going out there with... my mindset was like this. I'm going to go out and set up an entry control point for a downed aircraft, a crashed... we're going to go ahead and tag classified material and body parts. That's what I'm thinking. And then we're going to set up the entry control point so we can get emergency response vehicles out there. (0:00:21)

When I got up to the area where I seen it wasn't an aircraft crash, it was something that I couldn't identify. I was perplexed. Not understanding what I was seeing. I hadn't been trained for anything even close to that. So here's my... the gear adjustments that were switching were just crazy. I went from crash and recovery thoughts to... I don't know what I'm looking at. (0:00:55)

I don't know what is in front of me. I'm confused. And this is not a comfortable situation for a security supervisor. You're confused and not sure what you're doing. Not sure what to do. And that's the feeling I was getting. Of course I am talking back and forth with my teammates. And we're coming back with the same type of confusion. We're not sure what's going on in front of us. (0:01:18)

The craft was a triangular craft. It was black in color. Very shiny. It was metal, but it was smooth as glass. Inside the fabric of this triangular craft there was light movement of red and blue running through the fabric of it. I had pasted off and it measured 9 feet by 9 feet by 9 feet. It was approximately, based on my height, I'm 6 foot 2, so I estimated it at 7 feet tall. (0:01:54)

It was very small for an aircraft. One of the things that I was looking at initially was I was looking for obvious things that aircraft have. Looking for landing gear, looking for intake, looking for exhaust, looking for crew compartment, looking for windows. It was void of all those. That's where the confusion comes in at. I came back around to the right side of it. (0:02:33)

When I seen those glyphs, I seen that there's some writing up there, so I felt pretty comfortable at that moment. Because I said, OK, it's going to say United States Air Force prototype, something like that. It's going to say NASA on it. And then, of course, I seen something that I hadn't seen before. The glyphs that Peniston mentions are symbols that were etched into the side of the craft. (0:03:01)

Peniston sketched these symbols in a notebook, but their meaning is a mystery. As Peniston and his team approached the craft, they began feeling unusual sensations. The immediate area around the craft, we noticed physical changes. We noticed that the sound was different. For example, the lack of sound around it was like a deadening sound. We were hearing animals before we got within like 10 feet. (0:03:32)

And then once we got within this area right around the craft, it just, it went silent. (0:03:38)

---

Then we started feeling static electricity on our skin, in our hair, in our clothes. One of the unusual effects is that once we entered this immediate area around the craft, it felt like everything went in slow motion. It felt like there was a dragging of time. We did have, you know, discrepancies on our watches after we left the area of 45 minutes. And what appeared to be us just examining the craft for 5 or 10 minutes actually was over a couple hours out there. (0:04:22)

So we did lose track of some time. We do know that we did have adrenaline going. We do understand that that can affect, you know, the way things are perceived. But it was just too much, two hours is a long time to write off for adrenaline. Penniston knew that he had to be careful when reporting this incident. In my report, the term craft of unknown origin, I was not going to in any way, shape, or form use the term UFO in there. (0:04:57)

I used a military term. I couldn't determine the origin. And I let somebody else figure that out. I figured, okay, my job is to gather the facts, which I did. I let, and it's above my pay grade, let somebody else figure out what it was. So that's pretty much how I was looking at it. Also, we had a very real fear of our careers. (0:05:22)

Because we know that this is something that would hurt our careers, reporting this type of phenomenon. It just wasn't done. Penniston does have a theory as to why the craft was there that night. A feeling. That night, in retrospect, looking back at it, the feeling I had is that it was in trouble. It wasn't supposed to be there. The other odd thing is that, why would it land? (0:05:56)

Why would it be on the ground that long? Why would it allow it to be examined? Unless it had to. Unless it was repairing itself. And that's a feeling I had then, and I still have with it today. What kind of technology repairs itself? During his encounter, Penniston describes experiencing confusion, fear, astonishment, and awe. If extraterrestrial intelligence were to reveal itself to human beings, would humanity experience the same emotions? (0:06:36)

I think I agree with that the human race would probably experience the same type of feelings I had. But I think one of the things that I hadn't mentioned is probably denial. Is one of the also feelings you feel. Well, this can't be what I think it could be. I think that's part of what's going on there. Because, you know, we're rational people. We want rational answers. (0:07:02)

Especially in that position I was in. I mean, what we have in that base, in those twin bases. Largest tactical fighter wing in the United States Air Force. Penniston has written that the feelings he had during this encounter were unlike any he had ever had before. (0:07:17)

---

He describes an unexpected additional emotional state that he experienced. It felt sort of complete. It felt like it was okay. And then when it took off, there was an absence of that feeling. After about 45 minutes, the colors on the craft became more agitated as they once again became an intense white color. And then it started getting brighter and brighter. And now we're squinting. (0:07:51)

And all I could see was a white light. But it was still not as bad as when we first came up to the craft. Because this still could take off and go up to about treetop level. And I could still see the silhouette of the triangular craft. But when I initially approached it, it was just too bright. Description of what was going on was larger white light glowing. (0:08:17)

Approximately 10-15 meters from it, it was quite distinguishable. It was triangular in shape. It was not an aircraft. But it was a craft of some sort. Certain things didn't make sense. I couldn't determine the front. That was the problem. Second, it seemed running, but no sound. Third was the aspect of having electricity in the air. I could feel it in my clothing, my hair, my skin. (0:08:48)

The next one is after I got up close to the craft. The writing changes. It changes from being written confidently to shaky. Can I stop here? Sorry. I need a little time. Okay. Wow. Wow. Anything I could see, I would go ahead and write down. Structure of craft. Fabric. Black. Smooth. Glass-like. Surface unknown. Identity unknown. I paste off the size of the craft, taking notes of the distance. (0:09:41)

Size, 9 feet long. Approximately 7-8 feet high. I couldn't tell what was the front or the back. I had trouble when I was walking around the craft to distinguish engines. Propulsion unknown. No sound. But apparently operating somehow. Type of aircraft unknown. I made extra effort to look for the crew compartment or windows or anything like that, or access ports. Could not see any. (0:10:09)

There was no handles or anything like that. The craft was completely smooth on the outside. Skin fabric of craft. Warm. Probably the most startling part of it was the fabric of the craft. Aircraft are metal, and this was maybe metal, but it was very smooth. The fabric seemed like black glass. High electric static on clothes, skin, hair. Identifying markings on left front. That is probably the most compelling thing that said, well, my God, this is from someplace else. (0:10:44)

Symbols etched or engraved? Symbols recorded. All I know is I was out there that first night. I know I completed one of the best investigations of my entire military career. This thing wasn't lights in the sky. This was the object, a craft that had landed. I examined it. I walked around it. I felt it. This is an actual event. It happened. It doesn't matter what they say. (0:11:18)

I was there. They weren't. Liftoff, 245. No sound. (0:11:26)

---

No exhaust. Takeoff unknown. Speed impossible. The takeoff was probably the most amazing thing I've ever seen. With absolutely no sound. It just lifted up maybe two or three feet. And it did a little bit of maneuvering back in the trees. Momentarily hovered, then a blink of an eye, it left. Literally a blink of an eye.

(0:11:52)

回答 : deepseek-r1-desill-qwen7b

展開

Alright, so I have this task where I need to help someone organize a transcript of a UFO landing incident from 1980. The person has already tried to split the text into witness and narrator notes but got confused with the timestamps. My goal is to go through their provided structure and create a detailed bullet-point list that captures all the important observations, especially focusing on any altered consciousness or sensory experiences.

First, I'll read through the entire transcript carefully to understand the context. It's a testimony from a security guard who saw a craft in the UK during the summer of 1980. The witness mentions various details about the craft: its appearance, size, color, the feeling of electric static on their body, and even the subjective experience of time slowing down around it. There are also references to symbols on the craft and some theories about why it was there.

I notice that in the transcript, the narrator's statements (containing "Peniston") come after the witness's observations. This is crucial because I need to separate these two accurately. The user has already attempted this but may have missed some points or misaligned others based on timestamps. My job here is to ensure each point is correctly attributed to either the witness or the narrator.

I'll start by identifying all instances where "Peniston" appears, which marks the narrator's statements. These are likely from the security supervisor in charge of the incident and provide context about what happened, such as the crafts' origins or the investigation process after the event.

Next, I need to parse each observation made by the witness (using "I") and list them under their respective points. This includes details about the craft's structure, size, color, sensory experiences like static electricity, unusual symbols, subjective time dilation, and any other notable observations.

I should pay special attention to minor details that might be easily overlooked but are significant for a comprehensive understanding. For example, the exact height of the witness (6'2") gives context about the craft's scale relative to people nearby.

Another important aspect is ensuring clarity in each point. Sometimes the transcript can be a bit jumbled or repeated, so I'll make sure each bullet point encapsulates one specific observation without including unnecessary information.

I also need to maintain consistency in terminology and avoid any potential confusion between different witnesses or individuals involved. For instance, distinguishing between the security guard (witness) and the narrator (Peniston).

Once all points are identified and categorized correctly, I'll organize them into a structured bullet-point list under the witness's section for clarity. This will make it easy to review each detail systematically.

Finally, after organizing everything, I should do a thorough check to ensure that no information was missed or misassigned during this process. It's important that all key observations are accurately represented and easily accessible for anyone reviewing the transcript.

Here is an organized bullet-point list based on the provided transcript, separating statements from the witness ("I") and the narrator (Peniston). This structure highlights key observations, including altered consciousness experiences:

Witness Observations:

1. Craft Identification:

• The craft was triangular in shape, black in color, with a smooth glass-like texture.
• The surface of the craft was unknown but appeared metallic.

2. Size and Dimensions:

• The craft measured approximately 9 feet by 9 feet by 9 feet.
• Estimated height based on witness height (6'2") was around 7 feet.

3. Sensory Experiences:

• Electric static was felt on the skin, hair, and clothes.
• The immediate area around the craft experienced unusual sensations, including a dragging of time effect.
• Watches showed discrepancies post-exploration, with time appearing to pass slower near the craft.

4. Visual Observations:

• Internal fabric revealed light movements resembling red and blue patterns.
• Symbols were etched on the craft's side; these symbols were noted but their meaning remained unclear.
• The craft displayed a white light after initial contact, which became brighter as it attempted to take off.

5. Operational Aspects:

• No obvious aircraft features like intake or exhaust were detected.
• The craft operated without sound for an extended period before takeoff, which was barely audible and lifted two feet above the ground.

6. Theoretical Insights:

• The witness considered theories about the craft's presence despite its non-aerospheric nature, including potential repair mechanisms and extraterrestrial origins.

7. Behavioral and Emotional Impact:

• The experience led to a mix of confusion, fear, awe, and a feeling of being watched.
• The sudden appearance and disappearance of the craft were perplexing and contributed to the overall unsettling atmosphere.

Narrator's Insights (Peniston):

1. Craft Origin and Context:

• Pen Piston noted the craft was of unknown origin but speculated it might have been repairing itself or in distress.
• The incident was considered highly unusual, prompting a thorough investigation by military personnel.
• The craft was examined methodically to identify any potential extraterrestrial markings.

2. Investigation and Documentation:

• The craft was documented with sketches of symbols but left without further explanation.
• The witness's reporting avoided using the term "UFO," instead opting for a military descriptor to maintain discretion.

3. Emotional and Professional Impact:

• The encounter caused significant stress, including professional concerns about credibility and career implications.
• Pen Piston felt a sense of responsibility not to disclose findings prematurely while allowing others to investigate independently.

This structured approach ensures clarity, attention to detail, and distinction between subjective observations and contextual analysis.

(2025-05-05)