メインコンテンツまでスキップ

John Greenewald, Jr.: 有名な 1952年の国会議事堂上空の UFO 群の 写真は偽物と判明している

· 約5分
20241103_1952_ufo_cut.jpg

(1952-06-12)

FasterWhisper AI(large-v2 model) + DeepL(2024-07 model)​

約1年後、ルイス・エリソンド本人が再びステージに立ち、イタリアのグループの前に立った。このプレゼンテーションの中で、彼はプレゼンテーションの写真を見ている。ここにあるのは本物の写真です。彼が指差しているのは、1952年のUFO事件をCGIで表現したものです。 (0:31:01)

20241103_1952_ufo_pic_hoax.jpg

私はこれがCGIであることを知っています。というのも、私がテレビの仕事をしていたとき、実際にこれをライセンスしようとしたのですが、実際の所有者が誰なのかわからなかったからです。なぜその話をしたかって？ (0:31:13)

さて、これは他のテレビ番組で広く使われていたにもかかわらず、エリゾンド氏によるプレゼンテーションでは、1952年の出来事を撮影した本物の写真として紹介されていたからだ。1952年の実際のUFOの写真はない。このCGIやもっと古い写真のように、一般に出回っているものはあるが、実際には地面にライトの光が映っている。ほとんどの人がやっているのは、ライトをトリミングして、カメラに映った空の反射のようなものを見ることですが、それは単なるカメラのアーチファクトです。 (0:31:49)

20241103_1952_ufo_pic_hoax2.jpg

そのため、1952年のワシントンDCの国会議事堂の上空飛行の写真は、少なくとも知られていなかったが、それが本物であるかのように宣伝されていた。

▼文字起こし 原文 展開

Now, again, mistakes can absolutely happen, but it didn't stop there because about a year later, Luis Elizondo himself was back on the stage and he was in front of a group in Italy. And in this presentation, he looks, and this is the actual transcripts, at photographs on his presentation. What you see here are real photographs. What he's pointing to are actually CGI representations of the 1952 UFO event. (0:31:01)

I know for a fact these are CGI because when I was working in television, we actually tried to license this, but we couldn't figure out who the actual owner was. Why do I bring that part up? (0:31:13)

Well, because this was widely used in other television shows, yet was being pitched in a presentation by Mr. Elizondo as a real photo that was of the 1952 event. There are no photos of the actual UFOs of the 1952 event. There are some that are commonly circulated, like this CGI, and more commonly an older photograph, but you actually see the glares of the lights on the ground. What most people do is crop the lights out and then you see these like reflections in the sky on the camera, but they were just camera artifacts. (0:31:49)

So there were no photographs, at least none known, of the 1952 flyover of the Capitol building in DC, and yet it was pitched as real.

動画(1:12:14)​

UFO Updates & Controversies This Week: Elizondo’s Photo, USAF Claims & NRO Files

動画概要欄​

17,700 views 2024/11/02

In this week’s recap, I’m diving into some of the latest UFO revelations and controversies that stirred up the community this week. First, let’s talk about Luis Elizondo. Recently, he held a paid event where he showed what he claimed was a UFO photo – but it turned out to be nothing more than a chandelier reflection. This sparked a lot of questions about transparency and trust.

Next, I’ll discuss a story I just posted yesterday. The United States Air Force, in response to my records requests, stated there’s been zero Congressional correspondence about UFOs over the past decade. For those following the push for more transparency, this raises serious questions. Are we seeing a lack of communication, or is there something else going on here?

Then, we’ll cover the recent records released by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) that shed light on their contributions to the Department of Defense and Inspector General’s UAP evaluation. These records provide a rare inside look at how different agencies are engaging with the ongoing investigations.

To wrap up, I’ll be opening up the floor for questions from you all. Let’s talk about what these developments mean for transparency, disclosure, and the search for the truth.

(2024-11-03)