メインコンテンツまでスキップ

Richard Dolan : 米政府が「時空間操作技術」を保有していることを示す 発言/証言 の具体例 ⇒その実態は…

· 約24分

前置き​

昨日の記事、

Jay Anderson : 米政府高官が「時空間操作技術」の保有を公言した ⇒ この政府高官発言の真意を推測する

に関連して、Richard Dolan が関連する情報を語っている。下の切り出し静止画が説明がわり。文字起こしを付けておく。

切り出し静止画​

20250421_rd_0147.jpg 20250421_rd_0156.jpg 20250421_rd_0222.jpg 20250421_rd_0240.jpg 20250421_rd_0846.jpg 20250421_rd_1020.jpg 20250421_rd_1423.jpg 20250421_rd_1454.jpg 20250421_rd_1536.jpg 20250421_rd_1914.jpg 20250421_rd_1933.jpg

コメント​

  • Kratsios の "Amenricans WILL soon have the ..., scientific discoverries that WILL bend time and space" の WILL に注目。過去や現在の話ではない。

  • Trump の言う weapon は軍事用の兵器を指しているとは限らない。彼自身の交渉力を指している可能性の方が高い。

  • 他に、取り上げられている関連の発言はどれも良くてハッタリの類、多くは捏造だろう

…これが私の推測。

なお、一時期話題になった Pais（海軍研究所）の革新的な発明は海軍自身が追試に失敗し、現在、研究は中断と海軍が公表…とある。

Youtube 動画(30:19)​

Did the U.S. Create a SpaceTime Weapon Richard Dolan Show

FasterWhisper AI(large-v2 model)​

▼展開

Greetings and welcome to the Virtue Dolan show, where every week we fight the good fight. Can we bend space-time? There's been some news that has been somewhat discussed, but I do think warrants some further discussion. And this concerns the statement from a couple of days ago, April 14th, 2025, by Michael Kratzios, who was recently confirmed as director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. And he made a very startling claim during a speech in Austin, Texas, where he said, our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. (0:00:45)

They leave distance annihilated, cause things to grow, and improve productivity. And later in the same speech, he reinforced this concept. He said, Americans will soon have the choice to craft new technologies and give themselves to scientific discoveries that will bend time and space, make more with less, he said, and drive us further into the endless frontier. And the White House published these remarks on its official website, so it gives it much stronger air of legitimacy. And that sparked a whole online discussion. (0:01:29)

Here's the two main quotes, his two main statements. He really did hit on this notion of manipulating time and space. Again, he said, our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated. And then he says, new technologies to give themselves to scientific discoveries that will bend time and space, make more with less, and so forth. (0:01:55)

And then that just followed shortly after a statement by President Trump himself from April 9th, 2025, just a couple of weeks ago, less than two weeks ago, as I'm saying this here. Trump said, we have a weapon that no one has a clue what it is. And this is the most powerful weapon in the world, which is more powerful than anyone even close. (0:02:16)

I couldn't do that in a good Trump impression, so forgive me. And then you can go back a bit further, five years ago, to an interesting article in the War Zone. And this was discussed just recently. These are some statements by Lieutenant General Steve Quast, a very interesting article in the War Zone. I have it, you can see the link below, but I will link, I will provide a full link in the description box below. (0:02:51)

But this is Lieutenant General Steve Quast, he was quoted as saying, we have, now this isn't about space and time specifically, but this is about radical advanced technology. We have the technology to deliver, he said, any human being from any place on planet Earth to any other place in less than an hour. This is back in 2019. And Quast also stated that this technology could deliver wireless energy from space and eliminate the need for conventional power infrastructure. (0:03:22)

So not quite the same as space-time manipulation, but still quite radical. And, you know, this thing I wondered about, delivering any human from any place to any other place on Earth in an hour, could refer to space-time manipulation potentially, could also refer to what we might call trans-atmospheric vehicles, that would be advanced hypersonic aircraft or spacecraft that can temporarily leave Earth's atmosphere and then re-enter, or some other combination of conventional and exotic propulsion. (0:03:51)

You don't really know if we're dealing with space-time here or not, but still very radical and that was from five years ago. So really strong hints that there are potent capabilities that are below the radar, as it were, of our official truth in our society. (0:04:14)

So a couple of things about the recent statement by Mr. Kratios. The Newsweek article that covered this was one of the mainstream establishment sources that I saw. They were really trying to play down some of the literalistic interpretation of this. So in Newsweek there was a sense that, well, maybe his wording was metaphorical, maybe intended to refer simply to the powerful nature of modern innovation, not literal manipulation of space-time. Even Ross Coulthard, he did a piece on this just yesterday, he, I don't really know if he thinks this, but he suggested that Kratios could defend his statements just by saying, hey, I was speaking metaphorically. (0:05:10)

And he could if he wished to, I imagine. And there were other interpretations that I saw just looking through this suggested Kratios might have been referring to breakthroughs in AI or in quantum computing. And then in Newsweek and elsewhere you get, you know, everyone again saying, well, there's no concrete evidence, the claims are sensational, there's no device publicly known, we are told that can literally manipulate time and space or make distance irrelevant. (0:05:43)

And also it is true the White House has not officially clarified the statement, at least as of right now. And there's, we don't have any demonstrations of these alleged capabilities. So that would, that's led some people to say, look, the whole comment was a bit hyperbolic, or maybe a metaphorical reference to conventional tech. (0:06:13)

Maybe. Maybe. Officially speaking, we do bend space in laboratories, but not in reality. At Heidelberg University in Germany, for example, scientists have used what are known as cold quantum gases to mimic curved space-time. Don't ask me to explain it any better than that. But they create these miniature universes that expand and contract under controlled conditions. These are models, not true manipulation. (0:06:39)

But there is mathematics that allows for things like warp drive. Miguel Alcubierre, the mathematician at the University of Wales 30 years ago, did develop equations that showed how to compress space ahead and expand it behind. But the fuel, well, that is what is undiscovered. So apparently we have the formula, we just lack the ingredient. Military forces, as I'm going to describe, again, have been seeking this power. (0:07:10)

But at least as far as what we're being told officially, we have severe limitations to like warp space-time. I read one place that it requires energy equal to like the mass of Jupiter to get even some of these, some warping of space-time. The materials that are needed exist only in equations, so we are really only at the beginning as far as what we have been told. (0:07:45)

We can't do it as of yet. Well, space-time, there's a nice illustration here of gravity. Gravity bends space, matter makes a dent like a ball pressing down on a net. Other objects follow this curve, not from force, but from the shape of reality itself. So to fight gravity means flattening that curve. It's like a trampoline that has to be straightened. (0:08:13)

If you've got a ball and a trampoline, you flatten it out, that's anti-gravity. So has it been done? Can we do this? Can we? Well, as far as we've been told, we have the will, but we lack the way. But we are going to look at some of the evidence that the U.S. has in fact been working on this problem and is quite, quite serious about it. (0:08:34)

I want to show you this very, very interesting 1971 document from Australia. It's not from the United States. You can find this at the Black Vault. I have a link below here, but I'll link it in the description box below so you can get to it more easily. It's a very interesting paper. (0:08:52)

So this is from 1971 by the Australian Department of Defense. And this is a very fascinating window, frankly, into how one government assessed another's secret UFO activities. Because that's what this document from within Australia was all about, from May 27, 1971. It's titled as a minute paper with the subject heading, Scientific and Intelligence Aspects of the UFO Problem. So it's actually a very sophisticated analytical approach to the UFO subject. I've read this paper. (0:09:29)

It is quite, quite interesting. It was prepared to focus on aspects of the UFO problem. This is a that have tended to remain hidden. And it was compiled, this is important, from official reports and statements made by various US entities, including the CIA, the US Air Force, congressional hearings, and Project Blue Book records. So that's how this works. It's a three page paper. (0:10:03)

So one of the most striking revelations in this document concerns American anti-gravity research efforts. And the document explicitly states, this is the main part here that I want you to read, says allocating funds for the Avro Advanced Saucer Aircraft that was being developed in the 1950s, it looked like a flying saucer, and the launching of a crash program into anti-gravity power. (0:10:31)

And then to initiate such programs decades ahead of normal scientific development would indicate that the US government acknowledged the existence of advanced aircraft, which presumably used a gravity controlled method of propulsion. An additional motivation could have been the fear that the USSR would achieve this goal before the US. So all of this indicates that anti-gravity research was viewed as a very critical area of Cold War technological competition. (0:11:03)

So the document actually has much more to say about UFOs. It noted, for example, the obviousness of the debunking strategy as a way to manage public perceptions. In other words, the Australian authors of this were very clear in what they were saying is that, yeah, the US is debunking this, but it's really simply to manage the public's attitude about this. (0:11:31)

And it suggested that the old Project Blue Book, which had recently been disbanded when this document was created, was simply a tool used for debunking UFOs while more serious investigations were continuing elsewhere. But the purpose of the document overall was to express concern about Australia's own limited position on UFOs. It said, look, it would appear very wrong for Australia to remain ignorant of the true situation. (0:12:05)

So it was very critical of Australia's own UFO investigation efforts up to that time and says, look, we've really been relying on US Air Force public releases, which are essentially fake news. We really ought to do this properly ourselves. But again, the key here that I'm bringing up for this particular document was a responsible statement from over 50 years ago by another government, a close ally of the United States, stating that based on its own research, the US was actively working on anti-gravity. In other words, space-time manipulation. (0:12:41)

Many of you know who this man is. This is Ben Rich, former CEO of Lockheed's Skunk Works. And Ben Rich, toward the later part of his life, by the 1990s, he died in 1995, was giving a number of lectures where he stated, this is more than one time, he said, we now have the technology to take E.T. home. (0:13:02)

And he actually said a few things that were very, very powerful in these lectures that he gave. This is really toward the end of his life. He said the technology within the classified world was vastly beyond anything imaginable in the public realm, essentially suggesting that the classified world had the capability for interstellar travel. And then he actually did say we already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects. (0:13:33)

And he said it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. He said anything you can imagine, we already know how to do. That's Ben Rich. In 1993, he was saying things like that. There's a statement, a very compelling statement from this man here, Don Phillips, a Lockheed Skunk Works engineer. (0:14:00)

He contributed to Stephen Greer's Disclosure Project around the year 2000 or so. Very interesting. And he stated, he said, when I was working with the Skunk Works with Kelly Johnson, that was Ben Rich's predecessor running Skunk Works, he said, we signed an agreement with the government, the US government, to keep very quiet about this. Anti-gravitational research was going. (0:14:26)

And then he added, he said, we know that there were some captured craft from 1947 in Roswell. They were real, he said. And yes, we really did get some technology from them. That was back around 2000. By the way, Don Phillips had much more to say about UFOs in general. A very interesting man. (0:14:49)

But all this work on modifying spacetime, whether or not it resulted in a genuine flying saucer, we can debate. But it does look like it resulted in an extremely dangerous weapon. This is a very interesting article from about four years ago from Brett Tingley at The War Zone. And I'll just talk a little bit about this. It's very interesting stuff. So essentially, this article stated that there were internal documents from the US Navy revealing a very, very interesting venture into the realm of advanced weaponry. (0:15:21)

And this is from, I think, 2021, this article. So they got all their papers through Freedom of Information Act, and it detailed the work of a Dr. Salvatore Cesar Pais, and his patent for what was called a plasma compression fusion device. So according to the article, what made these documents so remarkable wasn't just the technology itself, but the capabilities. (0:15:50)

So based on that article, Dr. Pais' patent could be used to design what was called a spacetime modification weapon. They actually gave it the acronym of SMW, spacetime modification weapon. And allegedly, this weapon could be able to make the hydrogen bomb seem more like a firecracker in comparison. That was a direct quote from the article. (0:16:19)

That article also indicated this weapon capability would be achieved, it said, under uniquely defined conditions where, quote, extremely high energy levels can be achieved with this invention. So the whole underlying technology was based on what Dr. Pais calls the Pais effect, which he claims can, this is another quote, engineer the fabric of our reality at the most fundamental level. (0:16:49)

That's a terrifying statement right there. But doing it through what he called controlled motion of electrically charged matter, that is from solid to plasma via accelerated spin and or accelerated vibration. (0:17:04)

I'm going to leave it there. You can read the article and get into more of the details. But it's important to note that the Navy's experiments on this, which they did from 2016 or so to 2019, a little over half a million dollars, they stated that they did not confirm or they were not able to validate the existence of this Pais effect. (0:17:29)

That is, that's the official word on there. You always wonder, was there something more that they got out of it than what they're telling us? But the official word is they worked on this. This is, that was an unbelievably powerful weapon that they were working on more than five years ago that made the hydrogen bomb seem like a firecracker by comparison in the process of messing with the fabric of space-time reality itself. (0:18:00)

Very little that's more terrifying, in my view, than that type of a weapon. But they said, well, it didn't work. We failed at it. Well, okay, so there's actually much more recent news developments that I hope we don't forget as well. And this is from just a few months ago, brought to us from the journalist Christopher Sharp, someone I like and respect very, very much. (0:18:21)

This is just from November 2024, and this is all about the blocked Lockheed Bigelow technology transfer. The basic claim, this is all according to Christopher in the Liberation Times. There was an attempted transfer, I talked about this here on this channel a couple of times, of alleged non-human tech or non-human materials from Lockheed Martin to Bigelow Aerospace that was blocked by the CIA's Director of Science and Technology, identified as a man named Glenn Gaffney. So the transfer was reportedly related to the DIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency's program, which we all know is AUSAP, that is the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Applications Program, which we've heard all about for the last few years. (0:19:20)

So during this era, we're really basically talking from 2009 to 2012, where this attempted, this was a couple of times where they attempted to do this. So the main players involved, we got Lockheed Martin, which was supposedly, and still would be, in possession of recovered non-human materials, alien tech. Bigelow Aerospace was going to be the recipient company, which was contracted by the DIA for AUSAP. And then you have the DIA and the CIA's Directorate of Science and Technology. So those are really the four institutions or organizations involved in this. (0:20:03)

So the timing of this was supposed to be anywhere from 2009 to 2012, and mainly 2009 to 2010, from what I understand, or at least what we have come to understand. The materials that were supposed to be transferred were of advanced non-human origin, allegedly recovered since the 1950s, and were in Lockheed Martin's possession. And it was blocked, and it was blocked by Glenn Gaffney, who was then CIA Director of Science and Technology. And in fact, the discussions between the CIA officials, I assume Gaffney, and those attempting to do the transfer were described as very harsh, very angry, leaving a lot of the people involved feeling threatened, apparently. (0:20:52)

And the reason for blocking this transfer, the CIA was described as the original custodian of these materials, that is of these alien materials, which Lockheed Martin was permitted to possess. So all of this suggested that the CIA maintained ultimate authority over these materials. So as far as currently, they may still be in Lockheed Martin's possession, at least according to what we know at this point. (0:21:28)

And by the way, during the November 2024 congressional hearing on UAPs just a few months ago, if you recall, Representative Burleson asked Luis Elizondo, I've followed this very, very closely, he said, so there was a journalist, Christopher Sharp, who said there was a transfer between Lockheed Martin, Bigelow Aerospace, and the CIA allegedly blocked this. Can you describe that? And Luis Elizondo confirmed in his testimony, he said, an aerospace contract company requested to divest itself of the material that was collected in the 1950s. Unfortunately, that didn't actually occur. So he's really confirming everything that Christopher Sharp wrote about. (0:22:09)

And then Luis Elizondo also mentioned that when he was asked about Lockheed's expertise, he said he'd rather let Lockheed Martin explain the different domains that they're involved with. He said, I'm probably not authorized to discuss that. So I think that's a very, very evident statement about possession of advanced technology. That's not the same thing as saying that we're manipulating space and time. (0:22:47)

But when you are talking about possession of, let's just put it right out there, alien flying saucers that probably utilize some form of space-time metric engineering to do what they do, in other words, manipulating space-time, we can see that the United States government and classified scientific community have very likely been looking at this type of science and related technologies for a long time, a very long time. (0:23:16)

Now we could, we should mention that officially speaking, the Pentagon and the Arrow Office, that's the all domain anomaly resolution office, have officially denied the existence of any kind of crash materials from UFOs or UAP. They've denied any kind of reverse engineering programs. In fact, Arrow's historical report specifically said they found no empirical evidence for claims that the U.S. government and private companies have been reverse engineering extraterrestrial technology. (0:23:50)

That's a direct quote from them. You can believe that if you wish. I don't. So there's that. (0:23:58)

What does it really look like, however? Well, what it really looks like is you had scientists and military people signing papers in rooms of government buildings. They carried secrets. They took oaths. We know the Department of Defense spent half a million dollars just quite recently testing this space-time modification weapon. That is fact. Dr. Salvatore Pais filed the patents. That's a fact. The Navy confirmed experiments that ran from 2016 to 2019. The weapon supposedly would make hydrogen bombs seem like firecrackers. (0:24:40)

In 1971, Australian intelligence knew something. Their Department of Defense plainly stated, funds were allocated for the Avro Advanced Saucer aircraft and the launch of a crash program into anti-gravity power. By the way, that same document mentioned, I didn't state this before, but that by 1966 they indicated there were 46 separate anti-gravity projects that existed, 33 of which operated under U.S. Air Force supervision. (0:25:08)

I don't know how they got that information, but it's very interesting. Then you have the statement from Don Phillips that I mentioned over at Lockheed, who just said anti-gravitational research was going. We know that there was some captured craft from 1947 in Roswell. They were real. We know that back in 1953, the CIA ran what was called the Robertson Panel. This was a classified gathering of scientists to decide what was going to be done with these flying saucers and they decided the U.S. Air Force would use Project Blue Book to debunk these flying saucers, these UFOs, while the real work continued elsewhere. (0:25:54)

They created a system, I've called it legal illegality for years, to hide the programs costing probably billions of dollars of taxpayer money. Consider the pattern. You have multiple whistleblowers claiming that the same technologies exist, multiple government documents acknowledging research into these fields, multiple scientists verifying that the principles are sound. I think the conclusion stands before us, frankly. The United States government has pursued mastery over space-time itself. (0:26:24)

They have tested it. Have they succeeded? Have they weaponized it? Well, I don't know, but they surely are working on it. I came to tell you this because truth matters. I came because you deserve to know. What they're bending isn't just space and time. They are bending the arc of human destiny itself. Because we can't help ourselves, I'm quite convinced. We are pushing as hard and as fast as we can. We're using and trying to exploit this science. (0:26:56)

And you really have to wonder if there is anyone at the helm asking a simple question, should we be doing this? I suspect this will turn out just as some people were talking about AI 30 years ago, as in we need to slow down, it's potentially dangerous, etc. People back then were saying this, and other people back then were saying, are you crazy? How can we possibly slow down? And it was true, there was never a chance of slowing down. (0:27:27)

I think it's the same here. These weapons will be developed. Our species is in a collective, competitive group of nations that are going to continue to arm themselves against each other. Meanwhile, well, the technology could lead to a new, more dangerous arms race. I think it will. I mean, first of all, we know, and a lot of the articles that we're dealing with this space-time manipulation indicated that Chinese were working on similar technology advancements, and you have to assume the Russians are. They have a great scientific infrastructure. Would India be working on it? (0:28:10)

They have certainly the capability of delving into some of these physics and probably other nations as well. Perhaps most concerning are just the unknown physics implications. You have to wonder, can these technologies undo in some way the fabric of space or subatomic space or the fabric of the universe itself, if we even understand that? I certainly don't. But we seem to be talking about warping or ripping the fabric of space-time. To me, that suggests potential for catastrophic and unpredictable consequences in fundamental physics, perhaps. (0:28:57)

Well, it'd be great to hear some real experts discuss this, but it seems dangerous to me. I guess I'll just wrap it up by saying I think the development of space-time manipulation weapons probably represents a threat beyond nuclear weapons. You know, there's a historical pattern here of weaponizing every new technology that comes along. (0:29:25)

You have to wonder if humanity has the wisdom, frankly, to safely control such powerful forces. Is this what might bring the extraterrestrials to intervene if there's a threat of some cosmic scale damage or even self-annihilation through physics that we don't even understand fully? We'll probably have to wait and see. (0:29:42)

I would think that the risks in engaging militarily with something this powerful and probably completely unknown should be self-evident. Well, we'll see how much I know. Probably not enough. Well, that's what I have for you today. If you do like this video, please do hit the like button, subscribe to my channel, share the video. (0:30:10)

You can also visit my website at richardrolandmembers.com, where we have lots of content and a very active community. And thank you for your support. I will be back again soon. Bye for now.

(0:30:17)

(2025-04-21)